Topless sunbather accused of sensuously rubbing in sun cream | News.com.au
Printable View
Already is.
....ohhhh, election.....
Thought you wrote something else.
Sorry, never mind. At least one of the Pollies will get up.
Well here's one ...
The State Government and local council spent tens of thousands of dollars (our taxes) and threatening to jail myself if I dared shop down some dangerous fire hazard trees.
That was in 2000-2009.
Then a big fire came along on 7 Feb 2009 that killed about 172 Victorians similarly prohibited from protecting their properties and themselves and now the council and state government write to me and tell me, OK, you can chop the trees down (feral pine trees), provided you do it before end Aug 2010!
All the best
Snakeman Raymond Hoser
I probably don't have full support of people here, BUT, I'd love the independents likely to hold the balance of power in the new federal Government to insist on proportional representation in the house of reps to stop the stranglehold by the big two parties.
Proportional representation works well in Israel, and contrary to pupular belief here in Australia, major parties can and do govern well without absolute majorities.
ALL THE BEST
Snakeman Raymond Hoser
I've got to say that ever since the referendum on ACT self-government was overturned (a 65% victory to the "No thanks, we don't want self-government" vote and then the first ACT government had 4 out of 17 seats won by 'no self government' party members) I've been disillusioned with the whole political thing, so I don't bother with it these days.
The actions of both major federal parties over the last ten or so years have done nothing to re-illusion me, either.
Master Splinter, I think you echo the sentiments of most Aussies.
We know the process is corrupt and dishonest and are only a part of it because
we are forced to, under threat of being fined for voting.
I think the US system of "optional" voting has merit in that at least a vote becomes something worth chasing for the major parties.
Also this rort of taxpayer funding for major parties votes after each election is
another scam that should be stopped.
All the best
the snake man Raymond Hoser
If you have seen my earlier posts on this topic you already know what I think, but this guy says it better than I did. ABC The Drum Unleashed - The missing party in Australian politics
Yes, I agree that the major parties are in many ways "dinosaurs", but to get the idea that they are somehow in decline is I think a wrong extrapolation, (if you make that judgement).
You see nature abhors a vacuum and the major parties will probably fill it, rather than letting a third force move in.
Over the decades a number of third forces have moved in to take votes from dissaffected major party voters.
We had the DLP, Australia party, then democrats, then one nation and now the greens.
Excluding One Nation, the rest were centreist "sanity' type parties, trying to break free from the old ideologies of the major parties.
However the entrenched power of the major parties and the media they control, reduces everything to a "two party preferred" basis, with the direct implication the others really don't matter.
Boredom sets in and the major parties claw back the votes of the centreist parties as they never actually exercise any real power and so voters desert them when they fail to live up to promises.
Having stood as a candidate in various elections (state and local), I can assure you that the whole process is rigged in favour of the major parties and the real system we have is anything but democratic.
By way of example, people have been claiming "Communism" is dead for a few years now, but it is really alive and well, even if the communists change their names and claim they are something else.
Fabians are now in power in Victoria (Hulls/Brumby and their ideologically driven judiciary, which will take decades to remove at best).
Chinese Communists are stronger than ever and looking at other countries, most seem to have entrenched "two party' systems.
Totalitarianism and dictatorship and part and parcel of daily life here in Australia in the same way as China and many a third would country ... we just pretend it's different here.
As I've said before, if there is any single thing the independents could seek and get it is a proportional representation system that would actually break the power hold of the two major parties.
All the best
Snakeman Raymond Hoser
Snakebusters
Reptile Shows
The fact that they can hang on and have great powers to stem their decline does not invalidate the reasons why they are or could be in decline. The power now enjoyed by the independents is a reflection of the desire by a growing part of the electorate to obtain proportionality notwithstanding the current fetters. The problem with proportional representation, however, is that any crackpot who can muster a sufficient number of protest votes gets a guernsey. This can be fixed by setting a sufficiently high threshold, say 5 or 10% of the national vote. Most European countries have safety mechanisms of this nature.
The maths doesn't work F&E, 10% of the national vote would be equivalent to 10% of the seats in parliament, ie 15 seats:rolleyes:
I do however very strongly agree that an electorate based system belongs in the 19th century, with the horse and cart, and preferably only in the UK.
In 21st century Australia, with modern communications and transport we need proportional representation, state based like the Senate system.
That way, a party with 10% of the vote will get closer to 10% of the seats, not just 1 (and that for the first time in history!)
It will also kill off the current union/big business duopoly.
Apart from not worrying a lot about who does what.......its like death and taxes....they'll get you in the end, and both sides will become the "shafters" that governments always do.
But I wonder how much we all paid for this???
That's exactly what I meant, my apology if I was too concise. I have a vague recollection of it being 5% in Germany and Italy (where a centre-right or centre-left coalition is the norm). You do not want a 10 party coalition on either side, do you? :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Shed
frank&earnest, you wrote:
"The problem with proportional representation, however, is that any crackpot who can muster a sufficient number of protest votes gets a guernsey."
That is true, but it also seems to assume that there are no crackpots in the major parties, which is a thesis I strongly disagree with.
As it happens, even if 25% of the representatives in the house of parliament are crackpots, this should still leave the 75% majority with enough power to stop them doing anything, in the same way that the major parties pull their renegades into line.
My preference is that if 1% of the population want sex addicts in parliament, I say "why not?".
They surely couldn't be worse than some of what we have now.
Changing the subject slightly, another serious problem is that as governments come and go, the public service bureaucracy remains.
It's like "yes Minister" but worse.
And they are literally a law unto themselves.
They make the rules, break them as they see fit, change them as they see fit and have it all rubber stamped by (elected) ministers who are clueless as to details and just hope that the sh eee t does not hit the fan while they are on watch.
By way of example, in terms of my reptile show business
I deal with the Department of Sustainability and Envirnoment in Victoria, whom most people would assume deal with sustainability and environment.
Well you are actually wrong.
After presiding over the deaths of 172 Victorians resulting from their total and corrupt mismanagement of the envirnoment, along with the CFA and other government departments, the DSE has decided to branch into brave new business and management domains, including workplace safety, declaring the devenomized snakes regenerate venom (they don't) (contrary to what worksafe and everyone else seems to think) and worse still DSE are now going into the grog making and selling business.
Yes you heard right, DSE are now into selling grog!
They have just applied for a "Sam the Koala" trademark (trademark number 1374402) to sell "alcoholic beverages".
Anyway, they must have been drunk when declaring that devenomized snakes regenerate venom, so they may have something deeper in their new grog venture.
Maybe that's also why they are unable to tell the difference between male and female Koalas!
(see the link above for the details about Sam the drinking Koala).
And based on the records from the Federal Trade Marks office, they are also apparantly venturing into other such diverse enterprises as chocolate manufacture and selling as well!
And I'm sure you probably thought they were a wildlife Department?
All the best
Snake man Raymond Hoser
I see that you agree with the guy who said "if you are being shafted, don't move, you would only make him happier". :DQuote:
Originally Posted by watson
I do not subscribe to that philosophy, though. I agree that we do not have much to worry either way, but that is a reason for being thankful, not for being complacent. When I came here, in Italy the extreme left was kneecapping people and the extreme right was bombing banks and trains. Sometimes I feel I have been a coward to sell 20 years of education for the right to 1/20,000,000th of the wealth scrounged from the dirt of this country. That's why I want to see it sold at the highest price we can get.
Under the current system of course, a "crackpot" can get in to parliament with a very small percentage of the national vote.Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank&Earnest
Have you watched the 3 "independents"?
I rest my case (who was it that said something about the size of the brain being inversely proportional to the size of the hat?:rolleyes:)
Edit:
I couldn't find the 2010 figures, but in the 2007 election Bob Katter was elected to parliament with 32500 votes. If you work that out as a percentage of the total number of votes, you will find that is well below 1% (couldn't find the total for 2007, but it would be > 7 million me thinks)