I have been thinking about this thread in some depth: Well, as deep as my brain will go. The original 10% theory about brain usage has been debunked, although I may be the exception that proves the rule. It is probably more to do with the way we use our brain. Much in the same way as it doesn't matter how good are our golf clubs or tennis racquet but more importantly the way we use them.
Tonyz asked us to maintain a little decorum in the thread and mainly we have, particularly bearing in mind how contentious this issue is and how easily it can slide into general prejudice. That is not a plea to steer a different path, but to be respectful in the way we phrase our views. Take the British Houses of parliament. "The Hon. Member for Wapping appears not to have had the benefit of parents." We know what he means and is a little more subtle than Gough Whitlam when he retorted, "I remember." to Sir Winton Turnbull's tirade, "I'm a Country member."
Of course we are not like that here and have no parliamentary privilege behind which to retreat: So we are not going down that track. Enough of the digression, but I hope the contributors to the thread have picked up that much of what is being said is both valid and quite acceptable comment. We should choose our words so as not to cause offence even if we ourselves are in some way offended. This is not an easy task and if I told you I had never been guilty of it, it would be a lie.
To allow this thread to continue we should become gentlemen or ladies (not a recommendation for a transgender procedure).
I have myself attempted to contribute to this last section of the debate and twice I have scratched my words. It is not an easy task. I am still working on it and make no promises to come through with anything at all sensible. In the meantime I look forward to continued debate by the current and maybe new participants with thought provoking ideas.
Regards
Paul