Printable View
I would be happy to disclose any response from them. As far as I'd be concerned, there's no right to privacy unless you agree to it beforehand. Otherwise they could just send you a letter saying that you're a complete and utter $#%!!, and BTW you're not allowed to tell anyone that I just said that.Quote:
Originally Posted by corbs
If the letter was addressed to you, and you made no commitment to keep it confidential, then I'd say just post it. Of course I'm not a lawyer though.
That is a standard clause on most business communications, especially faxes and email. It is to stop unauthorised use in the event that it is sent to the wrong fax or email address. See the words "If it is not addressed to you"Quote:
Originally Posted by corbs
However, if it is addressed to you you may use it as you see fit and that clause does not apply.
Peter.
It actually goes a bit further than line fees and de-listing. The two major supermarket chains are pushing their "own brand" or generic product lines very hard. The feedback to their suppliers is: "If your product isn't #1 or #2 in market share terms, you'll be de-listed."Quote:
Originally Posted by Sebastiaan56
Leaving aside the devastation this will cause to Australia's food processing industry, the effect of this on the consuming public is that we will be denied choice. On this latter point, it's worth noting that one of the big two now sells canned tomatoes produced in Italy and packed in Vietnam where once they sold only Australian product.
Roger Corbett, Woolworths' former CEO is on the record as saying that 50% of Woolworths' costs are incurred between the back of the retail store and the shelf. His mission (still continuing after his departure) was to cut these costs right back. Think about that. The bulk of those costs would have been in wages. If the intention is to cut back on wages costs, the simplest way to do that is to reduce the staffing levels. So, if you've noticed a decline in the service levels in supermarkets, now you know why.
Other retailers tend to follow the lead shown by the supermarkets. Hence the missive from A & R, I suppose.
Quite right. Furthermore, the decline in brand choice, service levels etc at the major supermarkets is encouraging some smart operators to compete, not on price but on quality and service. So there has been a small but encouraging surge in high quality niche market food retailers. So far this is mainly in the fresh fruit & veg, meat and fish sectors but there are signs that it's spreading.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sebastiaan56
Is actually why I am currently looking to change to a new supermarket - our current one is overrun with it's self-branded product, and given the quality of some of the produce they source, why should I have any faith whatsoever in what they source for their self-branded range? I don't care about the few cents that their products are cheaper - if I have an alternative, I buy the other. But rather than see the entire range reduced to 3 suppliers, I'm finding a new place to shop.
The problem for A&R is that, within the book market, there are often no substitutes like there are within the supermarket industry. It's not like they will be able to bring out their own version of Tower Books titles, so if people want those titles, they will shop elsewhere. I suppose there are two modes of shopping for books: the purposeful and the meandering.
Sometimes I would walk into a book shop looking for a specific title. If it wasn't in stock, I would go elsewhere. Other times you're just browsing.
This has been going in the food industry for 17 years that I know of, I used to work in a consumer food company. Fortunately they apply it just as much to importsQuote:
Originally Posted by Driver
I heard some cuts from a conference where the CEO of Walmart told Roger Corbett not to worry, you can get around the regulators and Woolies can conquer this market. During the pharmacies in supermarkets stoush. In the Walmart stores I visited in the US there are no checkout staff. You scan your own stuff, process your own payment etc. I dont know how the security works but Im sure its there. Im told that every vendor has to have a 24hr service with a toll free number and vendors pay all costs associated with the promotion of their products. I also remember hearing that Walmart accounted for 10% of US trade with China. Havent been able to verify that one. That said the prices are super cheap.Quote:
Roger Corbett, Woolworths' former CEO is on the record as saying that 50% of Woolworths' costs are incurred between the back of the retail store and the shelf. His mission (still continuing after his departure) was to cut these costs right back. Think about that. The bulk of those costs would have been in wages. If the intention is to cut back on wages costs, the simplest way to do that is to reduce the staffing levels. So, if you've noticed a decline in the service levels in supermarkets, now you know why.
The future of big retailing in Aus?
Sebastiaan
G'day,Quote:
Originally Posted by corbs
I'll join in with Corbs on that, what total arrogance on the part of Angus & Robertson. :~ What comes around goes around lol.
I sent to A&R this :
>
> I read a letter from a Mr Rimmer to Tower books in the SMH today dated
> the 7/8/2007. I'm appalled by you!!!
>
> I buy lots of books all the time, I reckon my family's combinded
> purchases is probably about $1500 a year retail purchase. You however
> will never see any of it ever again.
>
> So goodbye and good riddance to you and your pathetic profiteering ways
> that expose small business and consumer alike. I hope you sell lots of
> "sale signs" lol!!!
>
> The only way i will every buy anything from you again is if you have a
> "going out of business sale"
>
Hate to tell you this C but I also saw generic novels in Walmart, plain cover, title like "Western" and "Romance".Quote:
Originally Posted by silentC
ps you must have as much to do as I have.....
Sebastiaan
they responded with waffle about my concerns with thier "negotiations with current suppliers", my "being offended", that they " do not intend to impact australian authors". The rest being marketing drivel about how great they are and how they support the local industry ,how some stores were making net losses each year and they have to rationalise to survive etc etc etc... Essentially a mass produced reply to im sure 1000's of people like me...
a load of clap trap really...
47 suppliers got the tower letter.
Yes, a bit quiet today!
Well, take Carpentaria for example - published by Tower Books, winner of the 2007 Miles Franklin Literary Award. You wont be able to buy that in A&R now.
The sad thing is that if other big retailers follow suit, you could see small independent book publishers like Tower disappearing and it will become very difficult for relatively unknown Australian authors to get their books printed.
my latest reply to them is this :
thank you for taking to time to reply with your mass marketed blanket response which does little to respond in any meaningful way. I still will not shop further with you and your diabolical mechanisms of communicating with your suppliers leave much to be desired. Fiscally penalising suppliers because they do not meet your OWN SALES volumes is a great way to lose suppliers, please by all means contunue to do so.
I still hope you go broke, I will from now on shop either online or at other retailers as this seems a much better way to reduce your profit margins further. I know my avg yearly spend is only a pittance to you, but hopefully there are many people like myself who will do the same and hopefully do to you what you seem to want to do to your suppliers.
Hey Zed, ever thought of going into politics?
Sebastiaan
Hey Zed,
Were the last words in the last 3 paragraphs "titles", "customers" & "needs" respectively?:rolleyes: Maybe they respect us equally.
Corbs
Very probably. :(Quote:
Originally Posted by Sebastiaan56
I guess the point is that the big retailers will succeed. Their generic branding strategy will work for them (they may not succeed totally in reducing their offerings to Brand #1 plus Brand #2 plus their own generics but they will certainly knock off a rack of small brands).
However, that leaves the door open to businesses who are prepared to offer high quality and service in niche markets. Those businesses will attract customers who are not happy with the big retailers. And those customers are increasing in number. The big retailers have, by the way, factored this into their planning. They're not fools and they don't believe they can gain control of the entire market but they'll get enough of it to maximise profits and reduce choice at the same time.
Here's a couple of interesting snippets from a review of retailing in The Economist a while back:
In the USSR, there were no branded goods under the Soviet system but consumers learnt how to read barcodes manually so they could identify which goods came from the better factories. A form of subversive branding!
Saatchi and Saatchi did a review of supermarket retailing in the US and the UK and drew the following conclusion: "Pity the poor shopper. He or she (usually she) is subjected to glaringly bright light, mind-numbingly boring music - interrupted by harsh "announcements" over the PA system, low ambient temperatures and confusing and misleading signage. Why would anyone enjoy this?"