Quote:
At the risk of pointing out the obvious, you already said that, you are repeating yourself.
Let me re-cap the sequence of events here.
You posted a clickable link to another forum
As these are not allowed, a Moderator (me) removed changed the clickable link to a non-clickable link. Something any of the Admins and/or Moderators do regularly. I could have left it at that, but I stated my reason for doing so in the edit box. Yet as has been admitted to by Mod's here there is no such rule. If the rule is such for links this covers all links even such as personal ones to web sites such as my own, business sites etc which now have Facebook, Myspace, Twitter all forms of Forums.
Whilst I was doing that, another member posted that he thought what you were doing was not allowed, ie he had seen this type of link being removed before.
Your beef is apparently two-fold, firstly you don't think Admins/Moderators should edit your posts, ie whatever you post is to be considered carved in stone, not to be altered. Its been talked about before Fred recall the editing done in NZcarvers posts and others. Yes by all means edit if you must but an explanation should be posted by the mod who does it a notification as to why. Otherwise it can be seen to be a vilification if you like
Secondly, you consider this rule, which you contend is not a rule, "stupid". That is of course your prerogative, doesn't change the fact that it is still a rule.
At the end of the day, if you refer to the wording to the effect of "The forum Admins/Moderators reserve the right to delete or edit any post" I would think that covers it.
If you want every eventuality that could possibly occur covered by a "written" rule I think you are going to be disappointed.
.RC., in my opinion you are a valuable member of this forum, I always enjoy reading your posts and have learned a lot from them.
In this case I think you are making a mountain out of a molehill.