Originally Posted by
DNL
Hey there Phil - I just went through the same thing, although I had my slab laid by a professional concreter.
I'm going to have a crack at it. I've only laid two slabs before, one for a pool pump filter, and a short pathway, so they were obviously MUCH smaller. But hey, same principal right, just bigger.....Wish me luck !
From my limited experience, I'd say the dimensions of the slab really depend on how you are going to construct the shed. For example, if you intend to set the side and rear walls on top of the slab, then the slab will need to be wider than the oustide dimensions of the shed. If not, the slab needs to be the same dimension as the shed, as the sheets will fit neatly over the concrete.
OK, that makes sense. I just assumed the shed would sit on top, and I'd seal up the bottom from the inside.
I prefer the latter method as then there is not such an issue with water getting in under the sheets as there would be if the sheets sit on top of the concrete.
Very interesting. I will do some more homework on which would be my best option.
To answer your question more specifically though, if you are setting sheets on top of the concrete, I wouldn't imagine there would be any main structual difference between 50mm to 100mm to 300mm - although the bigger the difference, the more water may pool on the edges and rust sheets quicker.
Don't forget, you may have a set back of side posts from the edge of the concrete to allow for side and rear battens which wall sheets are screwed to. So the outside edge of the posts will be in from the edge of the concrete by say 60mm to allow for the protrusion of the wall batten.
Hope this helps. Importanly, I hope the rationale is sound!
Thanks for the detailed reply, it was extremely helpful.
Cheers Phil
cheers
DNL