Indianapolis Colts 29, Chicago Bears 17
Printable View
Indianapolis Colts 29, Chicago Bears 17
So some horses and bears ara having a fight somewhere? :p
I watched about 15 minutes of it when the Colts were up by about 8.
I guess its pretty important, but I couldn't believe how long it takes for the ref to make a decision when using the video playback!
I don't know a whole lot about the sport, but I find it very slow. Have you ever seen a game of AFL football?
I thought most of the big arenas there were covered? It was raining pretty good, and all the coaches and players on the sidelines were just sitting in it, mics, head phones the lot. whats with that?...even the playback screen that the ref looks at had its own little poncho:?
I heard that an emu was duking it out with a picost somewhere, too....:DQuote:
Originally Posted by TassieKiwi
I know that you dont care.
But we care that you dont think we care about you caring if we care.
Al :doh:
Indianapolis 5 trys to Chicago 2.:D
I thought they called them touch me's or was it Touch downs.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wongo
But he didn't say that he cares about us caring. He said that he knows that we don't care.Quote:
Originally Posted by ozwinner
Personally I think that's a bit presumptuous of him. Even though I may not care, the fact of the matter is that some may, and if he really believes that they don't, then he's pretty silly for wasting his time. But perhaps he just likes staring at his own words out of vanity.
He should just take more care about telling someone who he knows may care about bears and colts.
Personally I think we should look after all animals,Especially dumb ones. :wink:Quote:
Originally Posted by martrix
Probably not called touchy-feelies.:o
The Bears should trade Grossman for David Hicks. Even though Hicks is in Guantanimo and has been for 5 years without being charged the BEARS would STILL be better off.Quote:
Originally Posted by rrich
I watched about 20 minutes of the game. Something happened. For about 10 seconds.
I only usually watch NFL games if this guy is playing:
http://media3.steelers.com/MediaCont...hris_43608.jpg
:o :o :o
He's my third cousin and plays for the Steelers. His name is Clint Kriewaldt
That looks a bit like a police photo. :D :rolleyes: Afraid the Steelers fell short this year. :(Quote:
Originally Posted by jmk89
Correct, I don't care
The way that the rule is written, there must be conclusive evidence to overturn a ruling on the field. When the ruling could affect the outcome of the game, the officials are painfully thorough.Quote:
Originally Posted by martrix
AFL - Here we call it Australian Rules Football. I have seen a few games on TV. The problem is that the broadcast is your local fare. There's nothing wrong with that but for one who doesn't understand the rules of AFL, the game looks more like a semi organized brawl. I would like to understand the rules better. (As you wished the AFL officials did also.)
Many NFL teams do not play in a covered stadium. The stadium in Dallas, the fans are covered with a roof, but the players are not. I'm not a fan of dome stadiums or green artificial turf. (Artificial turf is asphalt, a thin layer of foam padding and a green rug that simulates grass.) The new stadium for the Phoenix Cardinals is a dome but with natural grass. They roll the turf in and out of the stadium on game day. As SWMBO says, real football (NFL style) is played in the snow, rain and mud.