Nap.Blownapart
9th April 2007, 04:54 PM
Gents, I would like to impose on your collective wisdom if I may. The links show some pics of what I would say are some problem areas that I have inherited. I apologize in advance for the length of the post.
IMG0811.JPG (http://www.xmarc.net/dekc/img/CIMG0811.JPG)
IMG0812.JPG (http://www.xmarc.net/dekc/img/CIMG0812.JPG)
IMG0813.JPG (http://www.xmarc.net/dekc/img/CIMG0813.JPG)
IMG0814.JPG (http://www.xmarc.net/dekc/img/CIMG0814.JPG)
IMG0815.JPG (http://www.xmarc.net/dekc/img/CIMG0815.JPG)
IMG0816.JPG (http://www.xmarc.net/dekc/img/CIMG0816.JPG)
IMG0817.JPG (http://www.xmarc.net/dekc/img/CIMG0817.JPG)
The concrete slab as you can see has cracked. I assume it may be in part due to the weight of the columns which appear to be simply built on top of the slab. Shouldn't there be footings of some sort for each column ? I am not even sure there is any reo in the slab. I thought I would have been able to see evidence of that from the edge of the slab. And the cracks right through the slab (as in IMG0812.JPG (http://www.xmarc.net/dekc/img/CIMG0812.JPG)) in some places seem to reinforce that assumption.
Also, from the photo showing what sits on top of the patio columns, I would say it appears there are steel box-beams underneath the rendering, that are now rusting (those unsightly brown water-like stains in IMG0817.JPG (http://www.xmarc.net/dekc/img/CIMG0817.JPG)). Would that be correct ? No doubt there would have been no corrosion treatment applied to the beams. Who was the tossa that thought that was a good idea?
What do you think that brown (resin like stuff - hard to the touch) at the base of the column in IMG0811.JPG (http://www.xmarc.net/dekc/img/CIMG0811.JPG) is ?
The columns are purely an architectural feature, no structural significance. I would like to keep the columns themselves and "rework/render" them, but have no worries about ripping off the crap across the top.
I am not a big fan of terracotta tiles and would like to replace the patio area with pavers (of some type). In order to do so, should i just jack hammer up the whole slab (leaving the columns) and lay on a prepp'ed base or can I lay a base over the top of the terracottas. I can afford to raise the floor level up a further 5cm from the existing level.
Oh, another note: at the far end of the patio (IMG0814.JPG (http://www.xmarc.net/dekc/img/CIMG0814.JPG)), the area is enclosed on 3 sides and hence when it rains, water tends to pool and has subsequently has caused the morter to break up between the house wall and the 1st run of tiles. Maybe they wanted to build a 3-sided water storage tank. Probably more reason for me to hammer up the lot and start from scratch ?
All in all - it looks to me that this particular area was poorly built (or done on the cheap or rushed or all of the above).
Spose I wont see many free weekends any time soon :(
Any advise greatly appreciated.
IMG0811.JPG (http://www.xmarc.net/dekc/img/CIMG0811.JPG)
IMG0812.JPG (http://www.xmarc.net/dekc/img/CIMG0812.JPG)
IMG0813.JPG (http://www.xmarc.net/dekc/img/CIMG0813.JPG)
IMG0814.JPG (http://www.xmarc.net/dekc/img/CIMG0814.JPG)
IMG0815.JPG (http://www.xmarc.net/dekc/img/CIMG0815.JPG)
IMG0816.JPG (http://www.xmarc.net/dekc/img/CIMG0816.JPG)
IMG0817.JPG (http://www.xmarc.net/dekc/img/CIMG0817.JPG)
The concrete slab as you can see has cracked. I assume it may be in part due to the weight of the columns which appear to be simply built on top of the slab. Shouldn't there be footings of some sort for each column ? I am not even sure there is any reo in the slab. I thought I would have been able to see evidence of that from the edge of the slab. And the cracks right through the slab (as in IMG0812.JPG (http://www.xmarc.net/dekc/img/CIMG0812.JPG)) in some places seem to reinforce that assumption.
Also, from the photo showing what sits on top of the patio columns, I would say it appears there are steel box-beams underneath the rendering, that are now rusting (those unsightly brown water-like stains in IMG0817.JPG (http://www.xmarc.net/dekc/img/CIMG0817.JPG)). Would that be correct ? No doubt there would have been no corrosion treatment applied to the beams. Who was the tossa that thought that was a good idea?
What do you think that brown (resin like stuff - hard to the touch) at the base of the column in IMG0811.JPG (http://www.xmarc.net/dekc/img/CIMG0811.JPG) is ?
The columns are purely an architectural feature, no structural significance. I would like to keep the columns themselves and "rework/render" them, but have no worries about ripping off the crap across the top.
I am not a big fan of terracotta tiles and would like to replace the patio area with pavers (of some type). In order to do so, should i just jack hammer up the whole slab (leaving the columns) and lay on a prepp'ed base or can I lay a base over the top of the terracottas. I can afford to raise the floor level up a further 5cm from the existing level.
Oh, another note: at the far end of the patio (IMG0814.JPG (http://www.xmarc.net/dekc/img/CIMG0814.JPG)), the area is enclosed on 3 sides and hence when it rains, water tends to pool and has subsequently has caused the morter to break up between the house wall and the 1st run of tiles. Maybe they wanted to build a 3-sided water storage tank. Probably more reason for me to hammer up the lot and start from scratch ?
All in all - it looks to me that this particular area was poorly built (or done on the cheap or rushed or all of the above).
Spose I wont see many free weekends any time soon :(
Any advise greatly appreciated.