PDA

View Full Version : Some amazing stats















ubeaut
23rd February 2007, 11:52 PM
If sometimes you think the forums are running a bit slower than usual, this could be part of the reason why.

Just copied these statistics for Woodwork Forums from our stat counter: They are for January 2007.

I had to put some ,'s in to make it more readable16,272,289 - that's over, Sixteen and a quarter MILLION hits in one month.

Sixteen MILLION, two hundred and seventy-two thousand, two hundred and eighty-nine hits for January 2007 :o

<table><tbody><tr><td bgcolor="#ececec" width="80">Month</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td bgcolor="#ff9933" width="80">Unique visitors</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td bgcolor="#66f0ff" width="80">Hits</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td bgcolor="#339944" width="80">Bandwidth</td></tr> <tr><td>Jan 2007</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>224507</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>16272289</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>112.24 GB</td></tr></tbody></table><table><tbody><tr><td bgcolor="#ececec" width="80">Day</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td bgcolor="#66f0ff" width="80">Hits</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td bgcolor="#339944" width="80">Bandwidth</td></tr><tr><td>01 Jan 2007</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>497747</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>4.82 GB</td></tr> <tr><td>02 Jan 2007</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>514508</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>4.96 GB</td></tr> <tr><td>03 Jan 2007</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>547270</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>5.30 GB</td></tr> <tr><td>04 Jan 2007</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>484867</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>4.86 GB</td></tr> <tr><td>05 Jan 2007</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>507643</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>5.22 GB</td></tr> <tr bgcolor="#eaeaea"><td>06 Jan 2007</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>459350</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>4.23 GB</td></tr> <tr bgcolor="#eaeaea"><td>07 Jan 2007</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>458841</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>4.16 GB</td></tr> <tr><td>08 Jan 2007</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>549486</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>5.22 GB</td></tr> <tr><td>09 Jan 2007</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>527140</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>4.98 GB</td></tr> <tr><td>10 Jan 2007</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>522270</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>4.80 GB</td></tr> <tr><td>11 Jan 2007</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>534349</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>2.84 GB</td></tr> <tr><td>12 Jan 2007</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>507744</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>2.53 GB</td></tr> <tr bgcolor="#eaeaea"><td>13 Jan 2007</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>445506</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>2.16 GB</td></tr> <tr bgcolor="#eaeaea"><td>14 Jan 2007</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>478488</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>2.79 GB</td></tr> <tr><td>15 Jan 2007</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>561834</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>3.46 GB</td></tr> <tr><td>16 Jan 2007</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>538964</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>3.31 GB</td></tr> <tr><td>17 Jan 2007</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>557337</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>3.27 GB</td></tr> <tr><td>18 Jan 2007</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>562818</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>3.51 GB</td></tr> <tr><td>19 Jan 2007</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>540566</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>3.08 GB</td></tr> <tr bgcolor="#eaeaea"><td>20 Jan 2007</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>462251</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>2.66 GB</td></tr> <tr bgcolor="#eaeaea"><td>21 Jan 2007</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>523279</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>2.98 GB</td></tr> <tr><td>22 Jan 2007</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>607425</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>3.53 GB</td></tr> <tr><td>23 Jan 2007</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>578031</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>3.33 GB</td></tr> <tr><td>24 Jan 2007</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>569666</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>3.21 GB</td></tr> <tr><td>25 Jan 2007</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>549243</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>3.07 GB</td></tr> <tr><td>26 Jan 2007</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>499926</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>2.72 GB</td></tr> <tr bgcolor="#eaeaea"><td>27 Jan 2007</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>487800</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>2.79 GB</td></tr> <tr bgcolor="#eaeaea"><td>28 Jan 2007</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>504488</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>2.70 GB</td></tr> <tr><td>29 Jan 2007</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>583405</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>3.51 GB</td></tr> <tr><td>30 Jan 2007</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>566696</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>3.21 GB</td></tr> <tr><td>31 Jan 2007</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>543351</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>3.03 GB</td></tr> <tr bgcolor="#ececec"><td>Average</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>524912.55</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>3.62 GB</td></tr> <tr bgcolor="#ececec"><td>Total</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>16272289</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td style="vertical-align: top;">
</td><td>112.24 GB</td></tr> </tbody></table>

BobL
24th February 2007, 12:40 AM
err . . . .sounds impressive . . . but compared to ????

ubeaut
24th February 2007, 01:01 AM
Compared to????

What compared to?

Compared to having no hits on the forum at all I guess.

Do we need a compared to?

Can't we just say WOW and leave it at that !

journeyman Mick
24th February 2007, 01:04 AM
Average of around half a million hits a day, pretty bloody impressive I'd say.
Jeez Neil, it must be costing you a packet in bandwidth to keep us amused and off the streets :- , thanks:)

Mick

Clinton1
24th February 2007, 02:08 AM
wow!

NewLou
24th February 2007, 09:02 AM
AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE
OY OY OY!
:2tsup:

Honorary Bloke
24th February 2007, 09:30 AM
I know everyone here is proud, including me, but I wonder how many realise just how absolutely stupendously amazing those stats really are? I suspect Neil does. :clap: Aussie Aussie Oy Oy indeed. :)

fred.n
24th February 2007, 10:27 AM
And most online at one time was on Jan 25:)

ptc
24th February 2007, 10:44 AM
Hope we don't have to Que up to get on.

echnidna
24th February 2007, 10:50 AM
Congrats Neil for having the best woodies forum worldwide.

chrisb691
24th February 2007, 10:53 AM
Amazing stats Neil, and well worth a WOW!!

Personally, I thing the really stunning stat, is the 224,507 unique visitors. You got nearly a quarter of a million different people to the site, in one month. That is absolutely Stunning.

Grunt
24th February 2007, 11:03 AM
We host some websites of 16 or so companies. Combined they don't get the same number of hits or download rates that this site does.

Hey Neil, does you stats counter separate the drivel from the rest?


:D

chrisb691
24th February 2007, 05:01 PM
Hey Neil, does you stats counter separate the drivel from the rest?


:D

You mean the Friday thread? :D

DavidG
24th February 2007, 05:10 PM
Now if Neil could just work out how to get say 1 cent per hit......:U

Auld Bassoon
24th February 2007, 05:15 PM
Getting pretty popular :) Any idea what sort or ratio by country or thread?

Felder
24th February 2007, 06:02 PM
You mean the Friday thread? :D

What's a Friday thread?? :?:?

AlexS
24th February 2007, 06:51 PM
Congratulations Neil. I remember how happy you were when you got your millionth visitor (or was it hit?) jeez that seems a long time ago.

ss_11000
25th February 2007, 07:38 PM
congrats neil :clap: on making such a popular foum:2tsup:

namtrak
25th February 2007, 07:44 PM
Personally, I thing the really stunning stat, is the 224,507 unique visitors.

Absolutely!! great stuff, the hits are a bit misleading but the unique visitors is truly phenomenal!!

WOW

Wood Borer
25th February 2007, 10:07 PM
Well done Neil and the rest of the team.:2tsup:

They are very large numbers indeed and would make most corporates sit up and wonder why.

Lignum
25th February 2007, 10:17 PM
I dont understand these stats. Half a mill a day look, but bugger all post?
What is the % of posts to hits?

Honorary Bloke
25th February 2007, 10:40 PM
I dont understand these stats. Half a mill a day look, but bugger all post?
What is the % of posts to hits?

Well, IIRC from my webstat days, the unique visitors can be taken as the actual number of people looking in over a given month. Every page viewed is a separate hit. With 1,6M hits, the rough math is 6 or 7 pages viewed by each visitor on average. But we know that many of us view a lot more pages, so some are viewing only 1.

Some get here by accident, doing a search, the forum comes up and they look in out of curiosity. Others come only to look for an answer to a specific problem, find it, and move on. Then, there are the lurkers, enjoying the information but not posting for various reasons (the chief of which is, I suspect, fear of looking an ass in public :p ).

That leaves the rest of us, who apparently don't care if we look an ass in public. ( I offer, for illustration, the Friday Thread.:D :rolleyes: ) I, for one, read a great many more threads than I post in, trying to learn techniques new to me and to which I have nothing of value to contribute as yet (if ever).

I daresay the posts per hit ratio on the forum would be considered quite good, given all that.

oldbob13
25th February 2007, 10:46 PM
The potential here is what staggers me.
With 16 million hits, I still tell woodies about this great forum and they look at me blankly and say they have never heard of it.:doh:
Keep up the good work Neil:2tsup:
Oldbob13

sea dragon
26th February 2007, 10:00 AM
Neill,
That is a phenomenal result.
Notice how there are always more each mid-week day than any weekend.
How many at work are viewing, when they could be involved in "work"?
I hope these hits are also reflected in benefitting u-beaut, too.

BobL
26th February 2007, 10:55 AM
[SIZE=4][B]Compared to????

What compared to?

It must be the scientist in me that says a single number means less that a number with some comparisons. :wink: A few useful comparisons would be
- Same time last year, two years ago etc (demonstrating rate of growth)
- Compared to other WW sites. Just how far in front is the WWF?
- Compared to other large trade or hobby sites.

I'm not trying to put this forum down in any way. I think this is a FANTASTIC site, :2tsup: :2tsup: :2tsup: the information is incredibly useful, the response rate is fast and furious, the threads generally stay on track, the admins do a superb job, and the degree of anarchy, freedom of speech and nonsense is about right for me, but IMHO adding by comparative data I think the stats will be even more impressive than without.


Compared to having no hits on the forum at all I guess.

Do we need a compared to?

It depends what you are trying to do. Some of the big forums/sites publish their comparative data on their sites. It's pretty obvious they are doing this to generate PR attract advertizers.

On a personal side the stats are great but when I talk to woodies most have still not heard about this site and proceed to tell me about their favourite MDF (YAWN!) website. When I tell them about WWF they yawn and think it's just like their site. I'd just like to be able to say something more definitive (eg this site receives more hits than the next 4 ww sites put together!) about this being the best WW site.

I hope you can take this as a constructive opinion.

Cheers

Howdya do that
26th February 2007, 11:27 AM
What's a Friday thread?? :?:?

The quintessential example of Australian larrikinism, mateship, wit and intelligence that is the envy of every man, women and child from every nation. Thousands sit glued to there monitor every Friday’s with their user CP switched off wishing that they had the persona and qualities to participate. :D :p

BobL
26th February 2007, 12:03 PM
A very interesting site to visit is Alexa.com. It allows visitors to track website traffic and make interesting comparisons, eg you can track 1, 3, 6 monthly data etc. It's not for the faint hearted but most UBWWF people would be numerate enought to follow the data and logic involved.

For example, the image posted below shows the % of people (I suspect that is IP addresses?) reached on the internet (which is a better indicator that the absolute number of visitors) by UBWWF (in blue) in comparison with some other international WWF websites. The red line is for a well known US forum that has clearly gone down hill in the last few months. On this score UBWWF is clearly holding its own because as the number of internet users increase (especially in non english speaking countries) you would naturally expect to see a drop in % of people accessing websites.

Alexa shows UBWWF last week rated in the top 250,000 of all websites in the world as compared to the "well known US WW forum" which was only in the top 600,000 sites last week. More importantly UBWWF has gone up 5000 places in the last 6 months. By way of another comparison a well know international DIY website rated in the top 25,000 sites last week (BTW this site includes all manner of art, craft and basket weaving so it is not in itself a fair direct comparison).

On the Australian scene UBWWF currently ranks 8578 in term of traffic and only 42% of visitors are Aussies - we're a minority folks!

OK that's enough stats for one post.

Cheers

echnidna
26th February 2007, 12:10 PM
So lets all hope Neil's agents in the US do a roaring trade which in turn should help keep this forum online.

Ashore
26th February 2007, 12:22 PM
You know what this means Neil , you And Pauline are going to HAVE to find time to go to the awards this Year, And that means top accomodation for you and Pauline for the weekend , new clobber for the boss , you and with ties on ( Getting into a tie will be well worth seeing, let alone either of you in a suit) , Yep you just wont be able to ignoe the Best Wood Work Site Award when you win it AGAIN again this year :2tsup:
Rgds

Honorary Bloke
26th February 2007, 12:23 PM
So lets all hope Neil's agents in the US do a roaring trade which in turn should help keep this forum online.

I trust that was meant in all best wishes. :)

silentC
26th February 2007, 12:29 PM
Alexa shows UBWWF last week rated in the top 250,000 of all websites in the world
It's also currently showing us as number 12 in the sites categorised by them as Woodworking sites.

echnidna
26th February 2007, 12:45 PM
I trust that was meant in all best wishes. :)

100% right :)

Wongo
26th February 2007, 12:55 PM
Cheers Ubeaut :bowdown:

:clap:

BobL
26th February 2007, 02:13 PM
It's also currently showing us as number 12 in the sites categorised by them as Woodworking sites.

Given the vagaries and closeness of the stats for WW sites in the 8 - 12 rank (they are all in the 200,000 traffic range) I would probably say UBWWF is about equal 10th or so.

What's also significant is most WW sites in the 6 -11 rank are going backwards rapidly whereas UBWWF is going up.

Waldo
26th February 2007, 11:16 PM
The quintessential example of Australian larrikinism, mateship, wit and intelligence that is the envy of every man, women and child from every nation. Thousands sit glued to there monitor every Friday’s with their user CP switched off wishing that they had the persona and qualities to participate. :D :p

G'day,

Yeah, what the blue rat said. :2tsup: And I thought I was just some boofhead. :o

What Clinton1 said, wow!

Felder
28th February 2007, 09:57 AM
The quintessential example of Australian larrikinism, mateship, wit and intelligence that is the envy of every man, women and child from every nation. Thousands sit glued to there monitor every Friday’s with their user CP switched off wishing that they had the persona and qualities to participate. :D :p

:?
I wonder why I've never heard of it? :?

Cliff Rogers
28th February 2007, 10:15 AM
:?
I wonder why I've never heard of it? :?
What? Friday? Don't tell me you have never heard of Friday? :?

Waldo
28th February 2007, 10:18 AM
G'day,

Maybe with last Fridays booze up Felder's noggin has lost all recollection of Friday?

Will we ever read of Felder in Friday Drivel again? :( :o

(that's 5,514 Cliff) :aro-u:

Felder
28th February 2007, 10:23 AM
What? Friday? Don't tell me you have never heard of Friday? :?


G'day,

Maybe with last Fridays booze up Felder's noggin has lost all recollection of Friday?

Will we ever read of Felder in Friday Drivel again? :( :o

(that's 5,514 Cliff) :aro-u:

I have no idea what you two are on about :?

Rule number one: It is considered poor form to hijack the Administrators thread.

:ontopic:

Congratulations Neil. :clap:

Cliff Rogers
28th February 2007, 10:27 AM
...It is considered poor form to hijack the Administrators thread....
Crawler. :D

Howdya do that
28th February 2007, 01:03 PM
Rule number one: It is considered poor form to hijack the Administrators thread.

We need an ass kissin smiley!