View Full Version : Australian Flag
ernknot
22nd January 2007, 09:59 PM
It seems that business greed in Aus has got to the point where the idiots that run a musical festival ( sic Australia Day) put the date forward and ban people from carrying, or wearing anything that looks like a Ozzie flag.
I JUST CRACKED IT AGAIN!!!!! What the hell is happening in this great country????? Why are we bearing our #### to any religion/politics/agenda that may upset one or two f@#$%wits. What about the silent majority?? I get the impression that TV is to blame for a lot of this. Stir the pot and they will ratings. The so called Journos are nothing but a bunch of spoon fed half wits who would have no idea about what is going on in the world.
If anyone does not like the Ozzie flag then that's fine. I love it, my mates died for it, until the whole counrty agrees to change it I will love it the way it is. If those people who think it is sonmething to denegrade then come and see me , I will have a "chat" them. If "racial hatred " comes about because of the flag then those who hate it can off to wherever they came from if they are Ozzies then shame on them. The Australian flag stands for our way of life and freedoms, note the word "freedom"? This does not mean that any greedy grubby bastard who wants to cash in on our National Day has the right to ban our flag. Who the hell are the so call organisors?? I would love to talk with them and point them in the right direction - To Hell!!
ptc
22nd January 2007, 10:14 PM
Pauline. would sort em out .
Harry72
22nd January 2007, 10:17 PM
yes its not good but it may stop tension... see what happen at the tennis.
rick_rine
22nd January 2007, 10:30 PM
Personnaly , I don't like to see people wearing the Australian flag as a cape draped over their shoulders . It seems disrespectful somehow although I'm sure they don't mean it to be .
Rick
masoth
22nd January 2007, 10:36 PM
But ... but ... but, you can't claim any wrong doing at the tennis, or support Pauline, or object to the latest banning of the waving of the flag - WE ARE MULTICULTURAL YOU KNOW!!
One mustn't upset all those who have dual nationality, or never renounced thier old country when becomming Australian citizens (that too was a politically correct decision).
By next year one may not be permitted to actually show aliegience to any football club - that might upset the "collar and ties" in the next stand.
soth
Dan
22nd January 2007, 10:38 PM
I'm guessing Ernknot wasn't listening to Triple j this afternoon.:rolleyes:
SawDustSniffer
22nd January 2007, 10:43 PM
on tonights news in darwin thay said the concert backed down because little jhonny coward said "it was unAustralian to ban the flag "
bitingmidge
22nd January 2007, 11:13 PM
On our walk this arvo, I took this pic on top of the hill at Alexandra Headland.
Maroochy Council ain't scared of no wogs! :2tsup:
Cheers,
P :o
Clinton1
22nd January 2007, 11:33 PM
Like most issues of this nature, the decisons are usually made by Anglo, "umpteenth-generation" Australians that decide to make these decisons off their own bat.
My 'recent immigrant' friends think things like 'banning Santa in kindy's' is bloody stupid...
they'd just like it if their "days of cultural significance" could be included in the calendar so that their kids don't feel like they are missing out. Sort of a 'who cares so long as the kids feel happy' kinda thing.
Bloody uni edumakated, pc ratbags..... they'll be first up against the wall come the dictatorship, I say! :q
IMO, from the bloke that would never wear an Aus flag as I personally think it is disrespectful and a far too American. Banning it is just an matter of complete tossery though.
Seeya
Shedhand
23rd January 2007, 12:45 AM
It seems that business greed in Aus has got to the point where the idiots that run a musical festival ( sic Australia Day) put the date forward and ban people from carrying, or wearing anything that looks like a Ozzie flag.
I JUST CRACKED IT AGAIN!!!!! What the hell is happening in this great country????? Why are we bearing our #### to any religion/politics/agenda that may upset one or two f@#$%wits. What about the silent majority?? I get the impression that TV is to blame for a lot of this. Stir the pot and they will ratings. The so called Journos are nothing but a bunch of spoon fed half wits who would have no idea about what is going on in the world.
If anyone does not like the Ozzie flag then that's fine. I love it, my mates died for it, until the whole counrty agrees to change it I will love it the way it is. If those people who think it is sonmething to denegrade then come and see me , I will have a "chat" them. If "racial hatred " comes about because of the flag then those who hate it can off to wherever they came from if they are Ozzies then shame on them. The Australian flag stands for our way of life and freedoms, note the word "freedom"? This does not mean that any greedy grubby bastard who wants to cash in on our National Day has the right to ban our flag. Who the hell are the so call organisors?? I would love to talk with them and point them in the right direction - To Hell!!I'm sorry Ern, I'm not being disrespectful and I know where you're coming from. I wouldn't wear the flag either as it is disrespectful IMO (I'm ex-Army). However, Australian overseas forces marched and fought under the Union Jack not the Australian Flag as commonly thought by younger generations. Its fair to say that Australian soldiers fought for King and Country but its erroneous to say that they fought for the Australian Flag.
The problem the BDO organisers had to contend with was the possibility of neo-nazis and skinheads using the flag to incite racial hatred during the Sydney leg of the concert. I'm pretty sure that if there is racial trouble in Sydney then the headlines will read, "Aussie Flag bearing skinheads run riot". And you're right, the whole race issue is beaten up by the bloody meeja. If Pauline Hanson was an ugly bloke they'd treat her like the crazy Sydney Mullah. Every time the Howard govt slips in the polls he trots out the old racist or terrorism card. So, he has a lot to answer for too.
Rant off.
silentC
23rd January 2007, 08:29 AM
The best response I heard to this was "if people are causing trouble while carrying the flag, don't ban the flag, ban the people causing the trouble".
namtrak
23rd January 2007, 08:50 AM
It seems to me that our politicians love scoring cheap shots wherever they can, and accusing someone of being un-australian is the cheapest shot of all.
You only need to listen to people who were at last years Big Day Out to understand what the organisers are thinking.
It turns out that groups of young blokes were wandering around targetting 'non-australian' looking kids with the flag and were telling them to kiss the flag and swear allegiance to it or else they would get a beating. And this was leading to trouble - as it would. So for me the bigger transgressor isn't the Big Day Out organisers but these twerps using the flag to incite fear!!
Imagine if you were down shopping at Woolies and a group of RSL diggers came up to you and demanded (with threats of violence) that you kiss the flag and swear allegiance to it - what would you do, how would you feel? Because this is no different.
In an aside I also think, Howard, Iemma, Rudd etc get to score a double hit, because I also feel that conservatives like them feel truly threatened by events such as the Big Day Out, because they don't understand the schisms of todays kids. And to call the organisers 'Un-Australian' just puts another little wedge between main stream society and the youth.
In hindsight, I am sure the organisers would have done it differently but I don't think we should shoot the messenger - the real crims here are the little brats walking around raining on everyones parade with seriously misplaced nationalism.
Lignum
23rd January 2007, 08:56 AM
However, Australian overseas forces marched and fought under the Union Jack not the Australian Flag as commonly thought by younger generations. .
Sheddie, am i right in thinking that Australia only fought in the Korean War under the Australian Flag? Im pretty sure that was the case
ubeaut
23rd January 2007, 09:41 AM
Vietnam
http://www.ubeaut.com.au/auflagbig.gif
.
Lignum
23rd January 2007, 10:08 AM
Thanks. I knew it was just the one around that time frame
Oz.Man
23rd January 2007, 10:12 AM
Once again a media beat up rules the day and our lovely politicians jump on the band wagon. As namtrak points out the BDO organisers have said that they are not going to tolerate punters using the Aussie flag as an excuse to behave in a violent and racist manner. They are not banning the flag outright, they are asking people attending the BDO not to wear it because of the events that took place last year when patrons were physically assaulted if they did not kiss the flag. As a result of this some Sydney BDO patrons are travelling down to Melbourne rather than going to the BDO in their own city. If you were organising the event would you try and take steps to stop this sort of thing happening again this year?
I'll admit that the organisers of the BDO haven't explained things very well and next time they could certainly have some more PR smarts but don't get sucked in by the reptiles of the Australian media and the politicians with their ridiculous beat ups.
Studley 2436
23rd January 2007, 10:39 AM
Personnaly , I don't like to see people wearing the Australian flag as a cape draped over their shoulders . It seems disrespectful somehow although I'm sure they don't mean it to be .
Rick
It is in fact illegal to robe yourself in the flag. Pauline was breaking the law with that campaign photo those years ago when it was draped around her shoulders. I think the philosophy behind that is that by clothing yourself with the flag you are making yourself it's equal.
That is different to having a flag print on your hat or a T shirt that is printed to appear like a flag. The thing being that it is not a flag but a resemblance of the flag (we have lawyers here who will know the legal niceties of all this).
The flag represents the nation and it's people. So a print that is like the flag but is a piece of clothing does not have that authority because it is not a flag.
Anyway the whole thing that is wrong with the Big Day Out mob saying no Australian flags as they incite violence is that they singled out the Aussie Flag. If they had of said no flags likely there would have been nothing to notice that much, although I think the history of that event was it happened on Australia Day and so there were lots of flags on clothes and so on.
Studley
Felder
23rd January 2007, 10:41 AM
It is in fact illegal to robe yourself in the flag. Pauline was breaking the law with that campaign photo those years ago when it was draped around her shoulders.
So can we throw her back in the slammer? :p
Studley 2436
23rd January 2007, 10:47 AM
HAHA
My former Wedding Album supplier sells a Meranti Veneer cover on one his albums as Cedar!
It is shocking soft stuff that is only used because it is the cheapest thing he can find.
This is a very clear breach of the Trade Practises Act but he has been doing it for 15 years he claims without a complaint. GAWD I complained as soon as I saw the marks and bruises that just appeared by magic in that soft soft cover. Don't have time of money to sue him but you get my point
Studley
Bleedin Thumb
23rd January 2007, 10:54 AM
If Pauline Hanson was an ugly bloke they'd treat her like the crazy Sydney Mullah.
She is and they do.
Studley 2436
23rd January 2007, 10:57 AM
now you guys have me interested in the flags that our Troops marched under.
I know it was the Union Flag for the (pre federation) Boer War. Wars since I am not so sure. It might be a matter of the force they were with. For example in Afghanistan some of our SAS were with the Yanks to coordinate communication and avoid fratricide (friendly fire the Yanks call it) so those two would have been serving under the US flag in a sense because I am sure that they were there in their minds for Australia and their mates and so on.
Gunna do a google
Studley
Studley 2436
23rd January 2007, 11:07 AM
OK here is the War Memorials statement (http://www.awm.gov.au/encyclopedia/australia_flag.htm)
They say that Australians fought under the Blue Ensign and Red Ensign in WW1 and 2 as well as the Union Flag.
All three flags were used in recruiting posters though the Union Flag less so in WW2.
So no single answer for this one, like many things in history.
Studley
Sturdee
23rd January 2007, 03:57 PM
Until 1953 the Red ensign was the official flag flown at all Commonwealth places and was changed because Menzies didn't like the red colour as it was too much like the communist countries red flags. He had a phobia of Red's under our beds.:D
However we haven't fought any war under the official ( blue) flag as we have never had a declared war since WW2.
Peter.
Studley 2436
23rd January 2007, 04:08 PM
I suppose it is true that Korea The Malaysian Incursion (top work by the SAS there) and Vietnam were not declared wars in the traditional sense, just as the war on terror is an undeclared war in the sense there is no embassy to send papers to.
I'd hope that no one thinks this makes those wars incursions crises etc any less real than the World Wars. Is it just a European reading of history that doesn't place as much cred on wars that didn't happen there?
Studley
Sturdee
23rd January 2007, 04:29 PM
I'd hope that no one thinks this makes those wars incursions crises etc any less real than the World Wars.
Studley
The fighting was real enough and our soldiers deserved and still deserve our greatest respect and gratitude for what they have done.
I raised the issue as I have a problem with calling these military actions a war when they are not. In fact if the US and our government had the guts to declare war at the time of Vietnam and not hampered the military we would have had a better outcome. I also have issues with the war on terror but that is not a flag issue.
Peter.
Studley 2436
23rd January 2007, 04:54 PM
Well fair enough Sturdee. Politicians lost Vietnam. Remember the Tet Offensive. Politicians thought war is about metres of dirt when the military on the spot was rapt that they now knew who everyone was and who they were fighting. They had identified their enemy and were in a position to do something about winning the war but the politicians took flight and fled.
I think and this is something the Aussie Army is good at is the hearts and minds stuff. The Yanks don't have much idea. Remember when the major invasion of Iraq was complete and they wanted to bring in their heavy machinery and clear up the mess the locals were spitting. What if they said who can help get this sorted, given them shovels barrows and gloves and given the guys doing the job access to supplies? What about having doctors with the units on patrol to help with sick kids injured and wounded husbands etc? Instead they just disarm the Iraq army and create a mass of people disenfrachised and upset with the liberating/invading force.
Better stop there or we will get the topic deleted
Studley
Groggy
23rd January 2007, 05:42 PM
The troops in the field do not really give a toss whether anything is 'declared' - unless it has to do with the cricket. On a two-way firing range they only care about their rules of engagement; anything else is for someone else to worry about.
Since Vietnam, Aussie troops have been deployed in Ismalia (Suez), the Sinai, Sudan, Afghanistan, Kuwait, Iraq, Solomons, Timor-Leste, Israel-Lebanon, Namibia and a few other select holiday spots. All of these under the Australian flag.
Out of interest though, the primary motivator in battle is not flags or ideals, it is friendship. This is generally why a close knit team often outperforms larger forces, their training and reliance on each other builds trust, inter-dependance and motivation. This was the primary factor in the collapse of the Iraqi forces and their mass surrenders. It was also a significant factor for the Viet Cong in the Vietnam war.
Sturdee
23rd January 2007, 07:10 PM
Better stop there or we will get the topic deleted
Studley
Agreed, in fact I agree with all you said.
Out of interest though, the primary motivator in battle is not flags or ideals, it is friendship.
Then why does the RSL always trot this out when there is a discussion on the flag and what our flag should look like.
They always try to stifle rational debate with that incorrect claim even though the Union Jack in the corner is objectionable to a lot of Aboriginal Australians and means nothing to the majority of immigrants.
A distinctive Australian flag would be better (similar to changing our national anthem was) taking into account the needs and ideals of all Australians and not the small minority that came from England.
Peter.
Studley 2436
23rd January 2007, 07:18 PM
Talking about the flag I am happy to change it but I don't like all the new age mumbo jumbo that goes along the debate.
I do think there are some good points about the current flag, it has the Union Flag showing our history, the Fedaration Star showing who we are, The Southern Cross showing where we are. Keep the Southern Cross and the Fedaration Star I say but find something else for the Union Flag. Very importantly I want nothing that suggest any sort of Aboriginal Rights or anything else. That stuff has done so much to damage Aborigines it is not funny. Doing so likewise be to suggest there are two types of Australian and that goes counter to everything great about this country.
The big reason I think it is a good idea to look for a new flag is because I would like one that is clearly our flag and can't be mixed up with various others around the place.
It has been done successfully in the past. South Africa and Canada have two of the most distinctive and good looking flags there are. No reason why we can't do the same.
Studley
Shedhand
23rd January 2007, 08:09 PM
I refuse to fly the flag in case someone calls me a Kiwi... :oo:
Out of interest though, the primary motivator in battle is not flags or ideals, it is friendship.
Not any more mate. Its all about commerce - secure the oil. As Tom Waits sings in 'Road to Peace (http://media.anti.com/tom_waits/orphans/roadtopeace.mp3)' - "the US got no friends, only interests"
Groggy
23rd January 2007, 08:12 PM
Not any more mate. Its all about commerce - secure the oil. As Tom Waits sings in 'Road to Peace (http://media.anti.com/tom_waits/orphans/roadtopeace.mp3)' - "the US got no friends, only interests"Fair go Sheddy, I was talking about the individual soldier's motivation whilst in battle, not the pollie's motivation for putting him there. :rolleyes:
Hopefully that covers the other comments too. As for why the RSL says anything, ya got me there Sturdee, they've been out of touch for a generation.
AlexS
23rd January 2007, 09:25 PM
I get really p155ed off with skinhead hoons wrapping themselves in the flag and saying "I'm more patriotic than you."
And with politicians doing the same thing.
Lignum
23rd January 2007, 09:48 PM
A distinctive Australian flag would be better (similar to changing our national anthem was) taking into account the needs and ideals of all Australians and not the small minority that came from England.
Peter.
Suppose we can count our selves lucky the Poms colonised us and not the Dutch
Studley 2436
23rd January 2007, 10:36 PM
Yes the English are proper (sponsored)(sponsored)(sponsored)(sponsored)(sponsored)(sponsored)(sponsored)(sponsored)(sponsored)(sponsored)(sponsored)(sponsored)(sponsored)(sponsored)(sponsored)(sponsored)(sponsored)NO HOPERS WHO CAN'T PLAY CRICKET
We don't want them having too much say in how we run our country because if we do our cricket will go to the dogs and we will no longer beat anyone.
SO in the interests of Australian Cricket we should belt the Pommy Flag off of our flag
Studley
the Ubeaut swarer Stawper might have done an edit on this post, I hope it can spell OK
SPIRIT
23rd January 2007, 10:55 PM
flags flags blah blah there is no australian way of life because it is always changes every generation trys to hold onto what it knows and lives but we are a nation of changes we must to survive .
l love this country and the cricket team so we must learn to live and grow together to make it work .how can we rid the world of wars if a small group in large country cant live together .war is a symptom of the health and well being of the people
if there would be no more wars l would ban all flags now:C
Sturdee
23rd January 2007, 11:13 PM
Suppose we can count our selves lucky the Poms colonised us and not the Dutch
:D :D :D
Peter.
dadpad
24th January 2007, 12:31 AM
We hosted a Swedish exchange student. The Swedish student told us that wearing the (swedish) flag in Sweden would Immediatly identify you as a neonazi racist to any member of the public.
So ingrained is this view that she was quite frightend by the number of Aussies she saw wearing the flag. We straightened her out of course. Just one of many cultural differences.
The problems with punishing the racist louts is that their actions tend to be intimidatory rather than actually doing anything criminally wrong.
Lignum
24th January 2007, 12:41 AM
:D :D :D
Peter.
Good to see you agree with me for a change:)
Sturdee
24th January 2007, 03:15 PM
Good to see you agree with me for a change:)
I agree with you quite often, just don't tell you.:D In fact I even agree that the Domi is a great tool, but too expensive for the occasional M & T joint I might do.
Peter.
Studley 2436
24th January 2007, 03:19 PM
sturdee get a jap pull saw and a chisel and just knock em out darkside.
Works for me
Studley
Sturdee
24th January 2007, 03:37 PM
Studley,
I've got a small benchtop morticer which cost me approx $225 ( including 2 sets of chisels) and I cut tenons on the TS. Bit cheaper than a Domi.:D
Peter.
Gra
24th January 2007, 03:47 PM
Suppose we can count our selves lucky the Poms colonised us and not the Dutch
You been to Donvale, warrandyte, nunawading lately...... :D:D I went to school with more van-xxx's than anyone else. So what did I marry.... A Van Trigt......:doh:
Studley 2436
24th January 2007, 03:49 PM
Yep Sturdee have to say a lot of good stuff about things like the Domino the only thing is can you get enough work out of it to justify having it?
Basic tools cost less and are far more versatile even if they aren't as productive at specialised tasks
Studley