View Full Version : Automatic gearbox driving?
jow104
6th November 2006, 01:38 PM
Got a nice car out here in Oz, Mitsuibitshi Lancer with a 171000kms on the clock(rent a wreck hiring).
However the car is automatic and not having owned an automatic for 30 years (old BW35 gearbox) can anyone advise the correct proceedure when waiting at traffic lights for a long time or other stationary purpose, should I take it out of gear and put it into neutral to avoid wasting engine power when experiencing long delays?
( I would naturally leave it in drive at brief stops)
Your traffic lights out here in Oz seem to like only giving short time for right hand turners on main roads and engine seems to be wasting power with those long waiting periods.
Iain
6th November 2006, 01:42 PM
A lot would depend upon your country of birth (Och Aye) or religion (forgive me Rabbi);)
jow104
6th November 2006, 01:44 PM
A lot would depend upon your country of birth (Och Aye) or religion (forgive me Rabbi);)
Yorkshire bred Iain, (very careful with the brass);)
Iain
6th November 2006, 01:48 PM
I don't drive auto (except the Falcon on occassion) but would think you would select neutral or park so as to avoid the dreaded creep which I find irritating.
And don't forget only Sidley has those traffic problems, the rest of the world sorted it out ages ago:D
DJ’s Timber
6th November 2006, 01:51 PM
Just leave her in drive. It dosen't really make any difference if it's drive or neutral. I leave mine in drive all the time cause I am lazy and don't like the jerking every time you put it back into drive.
Daddles
6th November 2006, 01:52 PM
Don't worry about it unless the car itself complains. In the old days, it was a good move but with modern sludgematic gearboxes, it shouldn't be a problem. On a hot day, with the aircon blasting (hot fetid air), you may find she won't want to idle even if she is in good nick, but basically, don't worry about it.
Richard
Gra
6th November 2006, 01:53 PM
leave it in gear. no need to take it out of gear, it wont use any power whilst you are stopped
Rossluck
6th November 2006, 04:05 PM
Your traffic lights out here in Oz seem to like only giving short time for right hand turners on main roads and engine seems to be wasting power with those long waiting periods.
Don't start me on the lights! Our lights are so dumb in this country. I've come to an agreement with them. They'll always be turning red as I get to them, and I won't get my expectations up.
:mad:
:)
:D
Christopha
6th November 2006, 04:45 PM
just let 'er rest on the backend of the ute in frontaya and just sorta worry about the peddle things when it looks like the front bus is gettin' away....
China
6th November 2006, 10:31 PM
No
baxter
7th November 2006, 10:02 AM
Put it in reverse and give the bloke behind you a thrill.
rrich
7th November 2006, 10:28 AM
I thought that the reason that the automatic transmission was invented was so that we don't have to futz with the clutch at stop lights.
Leaving the auto trans in gear at stop lights causes far less wear to the internal clutches than shifting into neutral at lights.
MurrayD99
7th November 2006, 12:07 PM
Just leave it in drive - put yer foot on the brake. Brings to mind something by One of the Peter's in Peter, Paul & Mary - The Kid.... sitting at the stop light with one foot on the brake and his other foot 3" down on the gas... well, it was a while back
Bleedin Thumb
7th November 2006, 12:20 PM
Put it in reverse and give the bloke behind you a thrill.
Did that once in a fully loaded one tonner. I'd shifted down to 2nd to keep up the pace going up a hill. Shifted back to drive and missed and hit reverse.
The car leapt into the air and landed in the oncomming lane with the wheels spinning backwards ( the road was very wet) I fishtailed back into my lane just intime to pullup at a redlight. Drivers of other cars pulled up besides me with jaws agap whilst I did my best to look like I had meant to to it.:D
It wasn't long after that when the transmission started to play up.:(
jow104
7th November 2006, 02:13 PM
Did that once in a fully loaded one tonner. I'd shifted down to 2nd to keep up the pace going up a hill. Shifted back to drive and missed and hit reverse.
The car leapt into the air and landed in the oncomming lane with the wheels spinning backwards ( the road was very wet) I fishtailed back into my lane just intime to pullup at a redlight. Drivers of other cars pulled up besides me with jaws agap whilst I did my best to look like I had meant to to it.:D
It wasn't long after that when the transmission started to play up.:(
You have got me worrying again:eek:
Can I check if my box has a gate to stop that happening to me? Or should I see what happens on my gear box?:D :D :D
Bleedin Thumb
7th November 2006, 02:21 PM
You have got me worrying again:eek:
Can I check if my box has a gate to stop that happening to me? Or should I see what happens on my gear box?:D :D :D
You don't have to worry unless I'm on the same bit of road as yourself.:D
I dont know if you can do that with modern cars now. I was driving an old Holden with column shift.
Your probably the best person to find out for us though. After all its only a hire car!;)
You know what they say Live Fast, Die Young, Stay Pretty.
DJ’s Timber
7th November 2006, 02:28 PM
You have got me worrying again:eek:
Can I check if my box has a gate to stop that happening to me? Or should I see what happens on my gear box?:D :D :D
If you can bypass the builtin safety gate:eek: , go for it:D . The autobox would probably come out the side of the car:eek:
Stuart
7th November 2006, 02:42 PM
Most automatic shifters require you to hold in a button or a lever to be able to go into reverse, or into 1st (again, in an older car) so you can't bump the lever out of drive into anything but neutral. Get into the habit of going from neutral into drive and back to neutral without pushing the button, and you won't then surprise yourself one day selecting reverse or park (or 1st) by mistake as you are driving along at 100 clicks an hour.
johnc
7th November 2006, 03:38 PM
Not all experiences have the same excitement factor as bleedin'thumbs. I clearly remember going to change the radio setting on a column shift auto and bumping the shift to R, gave me a hell of a shock when the car started to slow down in a hurry with thoughts of gearbox all over the road. A quick bump back to D and it was off and away, nobody startled, no drama. I remember someone's story of managing to accidently shift a manual into reverse at about 100kph, went in as smooth as silk, let out the clutch and then everything went pear shape with a bit of mechanical damage done. Pity no one was there to share the experience with him, but listening to the story held plenty of amusement.
I guess it doesn't matter what you drive you can stuff up anything, just keep your concentration and don't obsess about what is a pretty minor possibility. For most of us it will either never happen, or if it does is unlikely to cause much excitement.
John
Iain
7th November 2006, 03:54 PM
Some of the new ones will allow the gear to be selected but nothing happens until the electronics says it's OK.
Schtoo
7th November 2006, 05:27 PM
Define 'new'.
The Honda we have won't shift into lower cogs unless it's happy with the situation. Also won't shift into higher cogs until everything is warmed up. Does not have a button on the shifter, but is gated and you push down to get the 'dangerous' gears, has 4 forward cogs plus lockup converter in top.
And the car is now ten years old.
I guess it depends on what the car is supposed to be more than the age of it.
I'd think the Lancer Jow has isn't going to be sporting the latest and greatest slushbox, even of ten years ago. Prolly just a regular unit that changes gears and thats it.
Now, how about a Fordomatic? There's a technological marvel right there folks. About the size of a freaking house, and 2 forward cogs that work when they want to. :(
Iain
7th November 2006, 06:39 PM
Honda 15 years
Toyota 10+ years
Holden/Ford How do they do that???:rolleyes:
BMW way ahead of the rest of the field and couldn't give a toss
Mercedes almost up there with BMW (and Honda)
Jaguar Just another Ford really
Doughboy
7th November 2006, 08:32 PM
I had an uncle that raced throughout NSW in an old EH and only ever had an automatic gearbox. He used to swear that he had it 'nicely' tweaked so that he could use it like a manual without the clutch. So does this make him the inventor of the clutchless manual?
Perhaps not since I can't remember if he was overly successful or not.
Pete
Chris Parks
7th November 2006, 11:23 PM
There is a theory going around that the only reason that gearboxes have cases around them is to catch all the bits when things go slightly wrong.
barnsey
7th November 2006, 11:44 PM
Driving auto's and manuals is a hazard particularly when you decide to change gear on an auto as if you were in a manual!!! Can be quite stoppy at times!!
Love the comfort of an auto and don't bother shifting to neutral - waste of time money and energy. Never ever put it in park unless you are in fact in that position and only when totally stationary.
Also do NOT fall for the trap of using the left foot for braking in an auto.
The number of cars I see with their brake lights on travelling up the motorway is scary - k after k.
Right foot only - Stop or go!!!
Jamie
Landseka
8th November 2006, 10:26 AM
I still vividly remember my first drive in an automatic car, a 1963 EJ holden it was.:)
After I drove it around for 15 minutes or so getting more & more confident in it I approached a set of traffic lights which started to change , forcing me to stop from the fair clip that I was travelling at.:mad:
No time for thinking automatic box procedures, reflexes take over........:cool:
Right foot on the brake firmly......
Left foot on the clutch for a downshift......
Oh bugga, thats not a clutch, :eek: its a 8 inch wide brake pedal with now 2 size 10 feet pushing hard on it.
Result? Came to a screeching halt some 30 feet short of the intersection....how embarrassment :o
42 years ago & it seems like yesterday.
Regards
Neil
Driver
8th November 2006, 10:33 AM
Also do NOT fall for the trap of using the left foot for braking in an auto.
The number of cars I see with their brake lights on travelling up the motorway is scary - k after k.
Right foot only - Stop or go!!!
I was a passenger in a car when the driver was doing this - driving with left foot resting on the brake pedal. After a while, I casually asked why he did it. He told me that his ankle got sore if he didn't have something to rest his foot on! :eek:
The same bloke used to indicate as he actually turned the wheel to take a corner.:confused:
jow104
8th November 2006, 01:23 PM
Here is someone elses view from Europe.
The answer depends upon how mechanically sympathetic you are and on whose car it is!
In "Drive," if you release the brake, the car will gently move forward on level ground on tick-over. This means, obviously, that with the brake applied, you are "holding it back" - which, in turn, means that the transmission is then under tension, or "wind-up." It also means that the engine is under load, which may cause some modern engine-management systems to alter the fuel mixture slightly. Purists may say that this would lead to a loss in fuel economy, compared to an "in neutral" tickover, but I wouldn't like to have to survive on the difference.
The transmission will be robust enough to deal with this, but if it's unnecessary and you didn't do it, then there would be less strain, overall, on the transmission. This, theoretically, would tend to lead to less transmission problems, or longer transmission life, or both.
In my car (I drive a DSG 6-speed auto), I knock it into neutral on delays of more than, say, 20 seconds, simply because I don't like to think about the unnecessary strains and stresses (I'm mechanically sympathetic!). If it were a hire car, then sod it (I'm realistic, I'm not going to benefit, long-term).
It should also mean that the brake sevo should have a longer life?
Schtoo
8th November 2006, 06:07 PM
I dunno about a DSG 6 speed auto, but the 4 speed (5?) in the Honda doesn't do any such thing.
If it's in neutral, the engine idles at about 1,000rpm. If in drive, it idles at about 800rpm. No change in throttle (engine throttle, not foot) position. In fact, most cars won't change what they are doing whether in neutral or drive, simply because that's not how the engine works, and if anything, the engine will use slightly less fuel since it's turning over slower.
Some cars may be able to add some more throttle, but they would use a 'fly by wire' throttle, and most cars with this technology don't have automatic gearboxes and fuel economy is not their primary concern.
As for the gearbox itself, it consists of a flexplate bolted to the engine flywheel. To this is bolted a torque converter, which is in essence a large hydraulic pump. In neutral or any gear, this pump is working to pump fluid around the gearbox for lubrication and cooling. As such, it is using up power.
(Hold it, that doesn't read right. But I am going to leave it until someone who is better versed in slushboxes corrects me. I only helped rebuild one of these monsters about 25 years ago so I don't know too much about them, other than from the pilot's seat.)
Possibly, the only benefit of being in neutral is that the gearbox is not under continuous strain when stopped. However, if you accelerate a little, then engage gear, you will shock the gearbox, occasionally quite badly, completely negating the 'advantage' of keeping it in neutral and possibly/probably causing damage rather than wear. This is very easy to do and I wouldn't recommend leaving it out of gear for a traffic light or train crossing. Stopped for longer might be sensible if you wish.
Brakes? No difference. Once they are stopped, they are stopped, no further wear will occur wether they are on or not, and they will be on anyway to keep the car from rolling.
But do be careful since the engine braking is reduced with an auto. That means downshifting when going down steep hills is a great idea since the engine can help take some of the braking duty, you won't use up so much worth of brakes (autos do use up more brakes, no question there) and you should, in a modern car with electronic fuel injection, gety a free ride down the hill since the engine will not burn any fuel when at speed but with no throttle applied. The injectors shut off until a set rpm point. In the Honda, that's about 1,500 rpm.
Also cools down the engine very quickly, and you can add braking by turning on the air conditioning while going down a large hill.
So there. (Thumbs nose at European know-it-all. :D )
chrisp
8th November 2006, 06:09 PM
Leaving the auto trans in gear at stop lights causes far less wear to the internal clutches than shifting into neutral at lights.
I concur with rrich - leave it in Drive. Less changes = less wear.
Chris
JackoH
9th November 2006, 08:32 AM
Jeez! Get a life you lot!