View Full Version : Source for MR16 LED
spartan
9th August 2006, 11:49 PM
I'm looking at replacing my 12 volt halogen globes with LED (36 LED) anyone got a good source and price for the globes?
doug1
10th August 2006, 10:59 PM
Have a look at the Jaycar site I believe they have various mr16 lamps including LED
Doug
duckman
11th August 2006, 08:45 AM
Jaycar
http://www.jaycar.com.au/productView.asp?ID=ZD0330&CATID=&keywords=MR16&SPECIAL=&form=KEYWORD&ProdCodeOnly=&Keyword1=&Keyword2=&pageNumber=&priceMin=&priceMax=&SUBCATID=
or Altronics
http://www.jaycar.com.au/productView.asp?ID=ZD0330&CATID=&keywords=MR16&SPECIAL=&form=KEYWORD&ProdCodeOnly=&Keyword1=&Keyword2=&pageNumber=&priceMin=&priceMax=&SUBCATID=
Cutter electronics
http://www.cutter.com.au/search.php
to name just three. :)
spartan
11th August 2006, 09:54 AM
Thanks....had a look at those sites....Its a bit disappointing that the technology doesn't seem to be there yet to replace the 50W 12V halogens with an equivalent LED.
The price is pretty steep too, but I'd probably pay that if I could get one that was the equivalent of 50W Halogen but only consumed 3W....
duckman
11th August 2006, 10:37 AM
Thanks....had a look at those sites....Its a bit disappointing that the technology doesn't seem to be there yet to replace the 50W 12V halogens with an equivalent LED.
The price is pretty steep too, but I'd probably pay that if I could get one that was the equivalent of 50W Halogen but only consumed 3W....
I've been researching this subject over several weeks for 'Homebrew" headlight(s) for my mountain bike and have learnt that Luxeon Stars produce the most light for the least amount of power but what you're after isn't going to be available for some time to come.
http://www.lumileds.com/
If you're thinking that you'll save electricity and therefore money by running LED's you might have to rethink your idea. As I understand it, dropping the 240v mains supply to 12v to power 'low voltage' lights consumes just as much electricty as running 204v lights. There is a thread around here somewhere in which people who are much more knowledgable on this subject than me made statements to that effect, IIRC. ;)
BTW, wattage is a unit of power and doesn't give a measure of the amount of light produced. Its especially important to get as accurate a measure as possible when comparing two very different types of light sources. :)
bresmith
11th August 2006, 03:19 PM
Have you had a look on EBAY.
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/2-x-30-LEDs-MR16-White-Light-Bulb-Lamp-WIDE-ANGLE-12V_W0QQitemZ300015025580QQihZ020QQcategoryZ20706QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
Still fairly expensive but l guess you save in the long run.
Do you know what the light out of these things is like. I would consider replacing my downlights if it was similar.
Brent:)
spartan
11th August 2006, 04:13 PM
I believe the best of the LED produce about 50 lumen...I'm trying to find out what standard 50W Halogen puts in terms of lumen to get an apple for apple comparison.
duckman
11th August 2006, 04:26 PM
I believe the best of the LED produce about 50 lumen...I'm trying to find out what standard 50W Halogen puts in terms of lumen to get an apple for apple comparison.
It depends on the colour and the 'binning' of the LED. Assuming you want white light then as a general rule
Luxeon III, 3w Luxeon stars put out 80 lumen when driven at 1000 mA but only 65 lumen @ 700 mA
Luxeon V, 5w, 120 Lumens @ 700 mA.
Currently, Cree brand Luxeon Stars put out the most light for the least current.
Website: http://www.cree.com/products/xlamp.asp
BTW, LED 'globes' are on special at Altronics.
http://www.altronics.com.au/index.asp?area=item&id=X2150
HTH,
Mark.
GraemeCook
13th August 2006, 03:53 PM
Spartan
Have you tried any yacht chandleries? - yachties are very careful on power consumption and minimising battery weight.
You might look at Whitworths in Australia or West Marine in USA.
Cheers
Graeme
Master Splinter
13th August 2006, 09:43 PM
Have a look at www.neco.com.au (http://www.neco.com.au/categories.asp?cID=142)
They do a few types of replacement bulbs for halogen fittings, except their bulbs are flourescent - so an 11 watt bulb gives you 50 watts worth of output. The beasties are supposed to last for 15,000 hours, too.
They do list a LED fitting, but at over $100, you'd want a pretty good reason to use one. As I recall, LED lights are not much more efficient than regular incandescent light fittings.
bresmith
14th August 2006, 01:46 PM
As I recall, LED lights are not much more efficient than regular incandescent light fittings.
I thought LED's were many times more efficient as they virtually don't produce any heat which is where most of your energy is used. The one's l have seen are only about 1.7Watts which is 30+ times more efficient than a 60 Watt incandescent. Whether they produce as much light is another question. The one on EBAY claims to produce 45,000 mcd of warm white light. How does this compare to a standard halogen?
duckman
14th August 2006, 02:29 PM
I thought LED's were many times more efficient as they virtually don't produce any heat which is where most of your energy is used. The one's l have seen are only about 1.7Watts which is 30+ times more efficient than a 60 Watt incandescent. Whether they produce as much light is another question. The one on EBAY claims to produce 45,000 mcd of warm white light. How does this compare to a standard halogen?
LED's are more efficient but they most certainly produce heat. The Luxeons to which I referred in my post, once they reach 3w, require heat sinks otherwise they'll disappear in a puff of magic smoke. :eek:
The point that still seems to be being lost in recent posts is that when running low voltage lights off mains (240v) power, the full voltage passes through your meter and so you pay for it, before it reaches the transformer or other circuit that 'knocks it down' to a level that can be used by the light.
I don't think that there is no benefit to either the hip pocket of the environment because the same amount of electricity is being generated and used.
bresmith
14th August 2006, 03:50 PM
I realise that by using a 12v transformer to reduce your voltage from 240v that you are not going to reduce the amount of electricity you are going to use. Otherwise we would have 110v like the US as a standard. If however the appliance that it is attached to this voltage uses 1.7watts (LED) as opposed to a 50watt halogen, then you are going to use 30 times less electicity to light the LED. Hence benefit to hip pocket and environment. Are my thought processes right about this or have l gone completely mad.
duckman
14th August 2006, 04:05 PM
I realise that by using a 12v transformer to reduce your voltage from 240v that you are not going to reduce the amount of electricity you are going to use. Otherwise we would have 110v like the US as a standard. If however the appliance that it is attached to this voltage uses 1.7watts (LED) as opposed to a 50watt halogen, then you are going to use 30 times less electicity to light the LED. Hence benefit to hip pocket and environment. Are my thought processes right about this or have l gone completely mad.
My knowledge on this topic is exhausted. As I said to the OP in my first reply, there are others around here who are far more knowledgeable than me on this topic. I'm surprised that at least one of them hasn't jumped in before now.
As far as the power consumption of a 1.7w LED versus a 50w halogen we would have to know how much power is lost in the tranformer or whatever circuitry is used before each light and then add that to the amount of power used by each light respectively.
Whilst I realise that you may be just using the figures of 1.7w LED and 50w halogen to illustrate a point, its a given that the LED won't be producing as much light as the halogen so perhaps comparing their respective power consumptions isn't relevant in terms of which is better for lighting a room if the LED just isn't up to the job. In terms of overall efficiency then I think the comparison would be valid.
Master Splinter
23rd August 2006, 01:49 AM
First off - for comparing basic efficiency, have a look at the wattage.
Two 12 volt, 50 watt halogens consume as much energy as a single 240 volt, 100 watt bulb - in fact they will consume a little bit more due to transformer losses. You typically have to replace one standard bulb with two halogens, so the halogens will cost a bit more to run unless you want to put up with significantly less light.
(Don't even think of the cost of replacing transformers that stop working for no apparent reason.)
Dimming (halogens or incandescents) doesn't really save money; the efficiency of the bulb goes down so you are getting less light for your lighting dollar. It's always better to have fewer, but higher wattage bulbs than lots of low wattage bulbs, as the higher wattage bulbs are operating more efficiently.
Then - compare the light output of the bulbs.
Usually this is in lumens per watt (how much light you get out for the amount of electricity you put in). Sometimes this is printed on the packaging.
Standard incandescent bulbs are about 7-24 lumens per watt
Halogens are about 12-36 lumens per watt
Standard fluourescent 30-100 lumens per watt
Compact fluourescent 44-80 lumens per watt
Really good (luxeon star) LEDs are about 30 lumens per watt
Damon_11
24th August 2006, 12:26 AM
Hello All,
A month or so back, there was an article on A Current Affair about a company called Neco (I just saw it and have no relationship with them), and decided to dig a bit deeper.
They do the in home assesment of lighting, eco freindly water and stuff. One of their big things is to convert all lights in the house to fluro bulbs. They sell fluro downlight compatible bulbs that attach to a 240v direct line.
http://www.neco.com.au/product.asp?pID=95&cID=47
They also suggest as others have here that low voltage does not actually save you anything as power dissipates through heat on the transformer.
The resolution, throw away the transformer, convert your enclosures to 240V with one of their conversion kits and add their 7W GU10 Megaman downlight bulb.
There is an energy calculator (don't know how accurate this is) which gives the representaiton of the savings. EG I just purchased 10 x 12v halogens on e-bay for the kitchen reno, cost me $100. To run them - apparently $159 for the year. After conversion kit and bulbs which would be worth $280, the power bill drops to $27. Seems fairly remarkable, but would take just over 2 years to recoup the investment.
The other thing they mentioned on the TV was in NSW, the gov was handing out all sorts of rebates to green up houses. Neco will come and do the assesment presumably to sell you plenty of kit, but through rebates scheme would give you a house full of fluro light bulbs and water saving shower head for free.
http://www.neco.com.au/product.asp?pID=164&cID=97
Anyway, I thought it was slick marketing, but it gets you thinking. As the edison screws have blown up at my place, I have progressively replaced with fluro bulbs. Mrs 11 prefers the light so everyone's happy.
Cheers....DC :)
Binks
9th September 2006, 11:39 PM
I have seen one of the new LED type halogen lamps at my electrical wholesaler recently. While they may be more energy effecient than standard
50 watt (12V) lamps, I don,t think they will produce enough light for your average living areas. May be great for additional lighting left on overnight etc.
atregent
10th September 2006, 10:18 AM
I saw somewhere on the net, not sure where though, that the LED replacements are equivalent to a 10W halogen.
I'd really love to get rid of my halogens, but the alternatives don't quite cut it yet I'm afraid. CFLs might use a lot less energy, but when I turn a light on, I want it to turn on! Up to 2 minutes to reach full brightness isn't what I'm looking for, plus I like to be able to dim them.
Clinton1
10th September 2006, 10:51 AM
The other thing they mentioned on the TV was in NSW, the gov was handing out all sorts of rebates to green up houses.
I would imagine that they are tied into the carbon trading scheme that the NSW gov brought in, ie. get a house to convert to more efficient energy practices and sell the carbon saving to a business that needs to reduce its carbon emissions.
built4thrashing
11th May 2007, 09:46 PM
you can buy the 1watt MR16 LED globes for about $15 each from some electrical wholesalers. I use middys. dont use the electronic trannys or the LED power supplys as they dont allow dimming. Iron core trannys are best and can run up to 40+ 1watt LED globes
null & void
17th May 2007, 08:35 PM
They also suggest as others have here that low voltage does not actually save you anything as power dissipates through heat on the transformer.
Most now come with switch-mode power supplies which would be in the order of 80-95 % efficiency. Gone are the days of the big iron core transformer - unless you buy budget.
patty
1st July 2007, 01:59 PM
I would imagine that they are tied into the carbon trading scheme that the NSW gov brought in, ie. get a house to convert to more efficient energy practices and sell the carbon saving to a business that needs to reduce its carbon emissions.
patty
1st July 2007, 02:11 PM
i have a standard hallway through my house leading to bedrooms it is about 5 mtrs long by about 900 mm wide and have 3 x 50 w halogens I have recently converted them to led 18 leds each and the light output is absolutley non -existent i am thinking about going for the high powered 5 -7 watt units that are currently on ebay has anyone used these? I think the brand is "environment'but they are bloody expensive any ideas anyone after the leds look good but the light outout is knowhere is comparrison you get more light out of a dolphin torch light
MrFixIt
1st July 2007, 03:24 PM
dont use the electronic trannys or the LED power supplys as they dont allow dimming. Iron core trannys are best and can run up to 40+ 1watt LED globes
Iron core transformers are THE MOST INEFFICIENT type of transformer.
zathras
1st July 2007, 07:47 PM
Lighting efficiency is how many lumens you get out for each watt of electricity consumed.
The latest CREE's are up to 80 lumens/watt and are a serious improvement on luxeons.
These do need proper heatsinking, as do luxeons.
I built a 3W Cree into a light for camping and it's the ducks nuts.
An earlier model I built used a luxeon and you could see OK, but it was a bit hard to read by the light.
The Cree pushes enough light to read comfortably for the same power draw. :2tsup:
I also have a Cree on the front of my bicycle and it works great.
Biggest problem with LED is the light is somewhat more directional compared to flouro/incandescent. This needs different optics to spread the light as needed, but for a downlight, this could be a bonus! The Cree has a 70deg beam angle where the brightest light falls, whereas the luxeon was almost 180 degree.
After playing with real power LED's you quickly realise the clustering of 5mm LED's is frivilous when you compare light outputs.
Ideally an LED light fitting is built with the LED in place, you should not need to replace the LED, so you can therefore design the heatsinking appropriately in a fixed batten.
WARNING, you cannot simply hook a bare LED straight to a DC supply, It will light very brightly for a very short time and soon after release the magic smoke and then all bets are off :o