PDA

View Full Version : the so-called pinnacle of soccer...















womble
10th July 2006, 08:32 AM
decided by penalty shootouts...what a boring way to finish.

Harry72
10th July 2006, 08:55 AM
Im glad the circus sideshow act is over... so sbs can put Mythbusters back where it belongs!

Toolin Around
10th July 2006, 09:06 AM
It's not about the game and may the best team win - it's about profits. Multiple games (if needed) don't fit nearly as well as a set schedule into such a scheme. The worst example of profit before game I've seen is at NHL games in North America. The game stops for commercial breaks. The first time I saw that I had no idea what was going on. All of a sudden the ref whistled the game dead and everyone skates over there respective benches and has a two minute break. They did that twice ever period - what a load of rubbish.

bitingmidge
10th July 2006, 09:10 AM
It's a lot more subtle, but the same happens in AFL games too.

The ads arrive after a scoring moment, and there's a light on the ground that signals when the ad's finished so the ump can bounce the ball.

No, you blokes are absolutely right.

Bring on the Cricket season!

:D :D :D
P

craigb
10th July 2006, 09:49 AM
Bring on the Cricket season!

:D :D :D
P
Yeah. Should we take bets on how much the Poms are going to lose by.

I go 5 nil. (and yah sucks boo to all the people that snaffled the test tickets and will have to watch a dead rubber!)

Not that I'm bitter or anything. :D

martrix
10th July 2006, 10:07 AM
What about Zidane's Liverpool kiss to Materazzi? I bet there is something deeper behind that!

Apparently now all the Italians will be pardoned for the serious match fixing crimes in Serie A because they won the world cup!!!..once upon a time, I longed for a Ferrari....not any more, bring on the precision engineering of Ze Porsche!

bitingmidge
10th July 2006, 10:20 AM
I go 5 nil. (and yah sucks boo to all the people that snaffled the test tickets and will have to watch a dead rubber!)

Not that I'm bitter or anything. :D
Well the good news is, that the guys I go with persevered, and we managed to get 8 tickets in twos and threes in a reasonable spot on day two of the first test.

Now we always go to day one, but beggars can't be choosers, so we figure that we'll either see:-

Scenario 1) Aus bats first:-

Matt make his double ton, then the declaration at two fer 500 at lunch, the Poms follow on just after tea.

or

Scenario 2) Aus bats second:-

Mat make his double ton, then the declaration at two fer 500 at tea, the Poms reeling with 350 to get in three days.

Well they couldn't beat a hall rug at the moment could they?

Cheers,

P
:D

Wongo
10th July 2006, 10:29 AM
decided by penalty shootouts...what a boring way to finish.

It is cruel but hey we’ve tried re-match, golden point. 120 minutes and penalty shootouts will get you a result. Unless someone can come up with a better alternative.

craigb
10th July 2006, 10:34 AM
Well they couldn't beat a hall rug at the moment could they?



Hahaha! Nope! :D

No Vaughan, Jones is in serious doubt and even Flintoff is under an injury cloud.

5 nil for sure.

:D

bitingmidge
10th July 2006, 10:42 AM
Unless someone can come up with a better alternative.

Play on after normal extra time in 10 minute gobs.

Every 10 minutes take a man off each side. No golden goals.

Last night, on that basis after 220 minutes of play, the Italian goalkeeper would have been the only one on the field, so there's a fair chance he could have scored in his 10 minutes alone.

It may not be any fairer that a shootout, but it'd delay the agony and would be interesting until one side got the upper hand.

Cheers,

P

Wongo
10th July 2006, 10:45 AM
…. And 10 minutes later the keeper is off.:eek:


Then wot?:D

bitingmidge
10th July 2006, 10:50 AM
Then this:
http://tinyurl.com/r6auw


:D :D :D
P

Andy Mac
10th July 2006, 11:12 AM
The whole event has changed my opinion about soccer ZIP! Dull as...:mad:

silentC
10th July 2006, 11:23 AM
I must say it was disappointing to see the cheats win it. But then that's the way it goes in the world game sometimes. :rolleyes:

Wongo
10th July 2006, 11:27 AM
It is one of those games that you wish both teams would lose. Bit like the broncos play the bulldogs. :D

bennylaird
10th July 2006, 11:35 AM
Is it over then? Who won?

bitingmidge
10th July 2006, 11:51 AM
Is it over then? Who won?

The real winner of course, is FOOTBALL!!!!

:D :D :D
P

bitingmidge
10th July 2006, 05:48 PM
secret video taken of the Italian Soccer team in training!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcCw9RHI5mc


P
:D

Sturdee
10th July 2006, 06:11 PM
. Unless someone can come up with a better alternative.


If no result after a game have the referee toss a coin to see who has won. Just as fair the penalty shoot out debacle to decide the winner.

In fact they could toss a coin instead of playing the match. More interesting that way.:D

Peter.

Clinton1
10th July 2006, 06:16 PM
Unless someone can come up with a better alternative.

Play AFL????

Or at the end of the game have a 5 minute break and then play till someone scores a goal, with 1 man off, each 10 minutes, from the team that has the ball in their scoring half the least.... play till they drop.

Anyway, thank god the wheels have fallen off the World Cup bandwagon, now all the glory hound 'fans' will fade away and there will just be the 'real fans' left.

Gumby
10th July 2006, 06:26 PM
I think each Coach should take the first penalty kick. That would be interesting.

It is a stupid way to win or loose a World Cup though.

Lignum
10th July 2006, 06:35 PM
Or at the end of the game have a 5 minute break and then play till someone scores a goal, with 1 man off, each 10 minutes, from the team that has the ball in their scoring half the least.... play till they drop.


And replace that player with one randomly selected from the crowd until a goal is scored. If no goal is scored just keep substituting a player with a spectator (only if He/She has bought their own boots) Then it will end up very exciting with the fans playing (bashing) each other;) I know thats a stupid thing to say:o Rock, paper, siccors would be the logical way to decide it:)

Grunt
10th July 2006, 07:06 PM
First of all I'd get rid of that stupid round ball and replace it with an oval one. Don't play on an square field, play on an oval. That way you can play cricket on same ground in summer.
Get rid of the top bar on the goal and make the uprights a lot bigger and add a smaller one on each side.

Allow the players to touch the ball with their hands. To give it a bit of skill allow the players to bounce the oval ball.

etc.

Toolin Around
10th July 2006, 07:08 PM
It is cruel but hey we’ve tried re-match, golden point. 120 minutes and penalty shootouts will get you a result. Unless someone can come up with a better alternative.

Have another game on another day until a winner emerges. Shootouts are garbage

silentC
11th July 2006, 09:02 AM
Give 'em all swords.

Grunt, yeah I suppose it would make sense to replace one girl's game with another :D

bennylaird
11th July 2006, 09:06 AM
Hey Grunt, think it's started to merge. Just watch Matty Loyd's acting to milk a free!

Think he's taking acting lessons this year as he heals.

Wongo
11th July 2006, 10:19 AM
Play AFL????

And you get half a goal if you miss.:D



Truth is modern day football is a bit like drivers licence test, mortgage approval or pregnancy test. We want the result and we want it now.:D

silentC
11th July 2006, 10:21 AM
Umm, with the pregnancy test, I'm more interested in the cause than the result :o

Lignum
11th July 2006, 01:54 PM
Forget talkin about loosers. What about Cameron White in the pommy 20/20 cup. Comes in when Somerset was 3 -21 and smashes 141 from 70, thats simply awsome:D :D And our so called learned selectors didnt even bother renewing his contract:confused:

graemecarson
11th July 2006, 02:01 PM
Was that the Soccer World Cup?

Bugger!, I thought I was watching the Italian Academy Awards.

Gimme a decent Wallaby Walloping anytime!