PDA

View Full Version : nothing















echnidna
24th September 2005, 08:28 PM
:d

echnidna
24th September 2005, 08:29 PM
nothing (http://nothingatall.no-ip.org/)

ozwinner
24th September 2005, 08:29 PM
Ya got to stop sniffing them gum leaves Bob.


Al :confused:

Wood Butcher
24th September 2005, 08:34 PM
:d

Don't you mean :D

:p

echnidna
24th September 2005, 09:08 PM
nothing said about nothing in over 30 minutes :D

Wood Butcher
24th September 2005, 09:14 PM
Every time SWMBO asks what's wrong and I say nothing she thinks that there is something, so I have to say something so that she thinks that my nothing means that there is something when really there is nothing.

I'm going now because I am getting really confused.:D

Driver
24th September 2005, 09:55 PM
Bit of a slow Saturday night is it, fellas? :p

savage
24th September 2005, 10:15 PM
If you think that I am going to waste my time keeping up with this thread on nothing you are sadly correct:p , as it has the potential to be a comical waste of time!....:D

savage.:)

rick_rine
24th September 2005, 10:18 PM
uh?

DavidG
24th September 2005, 10:25 PM
Footy must be over.
The children are bored. :D

Grunt
24th September 2005, 10:54 PM
Footy must be over.


Yup, watched a DVD on a Saturday night for the first time in 6 months. Going to have to find other things to amuse myself now that the footy has finished, maybe go out with friends or maybe go out to dinner.

BTW, I just watched Spider-man 2. Great movie.

Schtoo
25th September 2005, 01:36 AM
Spiderman 2 aint bad, but I just watched 'The Notebook'.

Not saying anything more than watch it.

Even better is if there is someone of the female persuasion to watch it with. ;) ;)

maglite
25th September 2005, 01:49 AM
maybe go out with friends

They must cost you a fortune each month to keep?:p

echnidna
25th September 2005, 11:40 AM
9 hours and still nothing about nothing

Daddles
25th September 2005, 11:56 AM
This is a blank post. There is nothing in it. If you feel that you are reading something, please take the pink pill now.

Richard

channa
25th September 2005, 12:15 PM
Nice link Bob - you're obviously an expert on this subject http://www.woodworkforums.ubeaut.com.au/images/icons/icon12.gif

Grunt
25th September 2005, 12:27 PM
They must cost you a fortune each month to keep?


No, I get the cheap variety.

bitingmidge
25th September 2005, 12:31 PM
!


























?

Grunt
25th September 2005, 12:44 PM
The contents of George W. Bush's head

Schtoo
25th September 2005, 01:05 PM
The contents of George W. Bush's head

I thought that came out of a dust collector???

Or is that > insert politico type here < ? ;)

Iain
25th September 2005, 01:08 PM
Speaking of nothing, I put the TV on thismorning for the news and guess what, yesterday was a grand final.
I had no idea...................

echnidna
25th September 2005, 05:44 PM
Exactly Midge! :D :D :D

the others obviously didn't read this (http://nothingatall.no-ip.org/)

outback
25th September 2005, 08:32 PM
I have nothing further to add.

Wongo
26th September 2005, 10:37 AM
Fine!

Grunt
26th September 2005, 06:11 PM
I have nothing further to add.


You had nothing to add in the first place.


:D

Ashore
26th September 2005, 06:38 PM
The Romans didn't have nothing , and thats why our maths is better than there's .

It's also what Paramatta got in sunday's game




The trouble with life is there's no background music.

Russell

outback
26th September 2005, 07:06 PM
You had nothing to add in the first place.


:D

:p :p :p :p :p :p :p :p :p

Do two nothings make a vacuum?

DavidG
26th September 2005, 07:56 PM
But nothing is something else it would be nothing.

corbs
26th September 2005, 09:26 PM
something

<img src="http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b179/corbs1975/General/Nobaa.gif" alt="Image hosted by Photobucket.com">

Gingermick
27th September 2005, 01:47 PM
cowboys cowboys cowboys

E. maculata
27th September 2005, 05:17 PM
I reckon yous lot might be onto something over here

RETIRED
27th September 2005, 07:55 PM
I reckon yous lot might be onto something over here
Was that "onto" or "on".

DavidG
27th September 2005, 08:10 PM
I think he meant on. Wheeeeeee...

outback
27th September 2005, 08:12 PM
I really wish I had something to add
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Nah, I still got nuthin'

JohnM
28th September 2005, 12:19 AM
Get back to your sheds; you've done nothing for three days :D

rodm
28th September 2005, 03:40 AM
This thread is a bit like a blind man looking for a black cat in a dark room that isn't really there.

Daddles
28th September 2005, 11:11 AM
You lot are sick, sad and sick. It's no wonder I feel at home here :D

Richard

Cagey
28th September 2005, 07:38 PM
Nothing

pron.
No thing; not anything: <cite>The box contained nothing. I've heard nothing about it.</cite>
No part; no portion: <cite>Nothing remains of the old house but the cellar hole.</cite>
One of no consequence, significance, or interest: <cite>The new nonsmoking policy is nothing to me.</cite>

n.
Something that has no existence.
Something that has no quantitative value; zero: <cite>a score of two to nothing.</cite>
One that has no substance or importance; a nonentity: “A nothing is a dreadful thing to hold onto” (Edna O'Brien).

adj. <dl> <dd>Insignificant or worthless: “the utterly nothing role of a wealthy suitor” (Bosley Crowther). </dd> </dl>
adv. <dl> <dd>In no way or degree; not at all: <cite>She looks nothing like her sister.</cite> </dd> </dl>
Idioms:
<cite>for nothing</cite>
Free of charge.
To no avail: <cite>all that trouble for nothing.</cite>
For no reason: <cite>fired him for nothing.</cite>
<cite>in nothing flat</cite> <dl> <dd> In very little time; very quickly.</dd> </dl> <cite>nothing doing</cite> Informal <dl> <dd>Certainly not.</dd> </dl>
<hr align="left" width="25%">[Middle English, from Old English<tt> nhttp://cache.lexico.com/dictionary/graphics/AHD4/GIF/amacr.gifthing</tt> :<tt> nhttp://cache.lexico.com/dictionary/graphics/AHD4/GIF/amacr.gif</tt>, no; see no<sup>2</sup> +<tt> thing</tt>, thing; see thing.]
Usage Note: According to the traditional rule, nothing is invariably treated as a singular, even when followed by an exception phrase containing a plural noun: <cite>Nothing except your fears stands (not stand) in your way. Nothing but roses meets (not meet) the eye.</cite> See Usage Note at none (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=none).

echnidna
28th September 2005, 07:39 PM
That's pretty good.
A thread about nothing has lasted 3 days
and got 36 posts.

But sadly it seems about 600 odd woodies couldn't find anything to post, how very very sad :rolleyes:

All newcomers to this thread please read and understand THIS (http://nothingatall.no-ip.org/)

rick_rine
28th September 2005, 08:09 PM
But sadly it seems about 600 odd woodies couldn't find anything to post, how very very sad :rolleyes:

All newcomers to this thread please read and understand THIS (http://nothingatall.no-ip.org/)

Who are the " odd woodies " echidna ? Personally I reckon they're the ones posting to this stupid post ( like me ) , not the ones who have ignored it . They are probably sane !

.

DavidG
28th September 2005, 08:16 PM
Nothing is the lack or absence of anything. "Nothing" and "zero" are closely related but not identical concepts.

The term "nothing" is rarely used mathematically, though it could be said that a set contains nothing if and only if it is the empty set, in which case its cardinality (or size) is zero.

Nothing differs from zero in the way that zero is something, a finite amount which is defined. While nothing overlaps the quantity zero, in the way that it also is, when finitely defined, zero, it differs in the way that it has no specific basis like zero does in numbers.

If looked at philosophically, the concept of "nothing" can have many interpretations. In fact, people can even state that nothing does not exist. You cannot sense, see, feel, or think nothing. There is no contact with nothing.

Nothing is where everything isn't. Visualizing "nothing" would make "something". It could be seen as a physical void or as just a word which only has meaning when used to describe a relationship between different "somethings". There is no "right" or "wrong" in the interpretation of the word "nothing". Everyone is entitled to their own ideas and interpretations.

The concept of "nothing" has been studied throughout history by philosophers and theologians; many have found that careful consideration of the notion can easily lead to the logical fallacy of reification. The understanding of "nothing" varies widely between cultures, especially between Western and Eastern cultures and philosophical traditions, though existentialism, and in particular Heidegger have brought the understandings closer together.

Cagey
28th September 2005, 08:36 PM
This whole subject is much a do about nothing.

annihilation, aught, bagatelle, blank, cipher, crumb, diddly, duck egg, extinction, fly speck, goose egg, insignificancy, naught, nihility, nix, no thing, nobody, nonbeing, nonentity, nonexistence, not anything, nought, nullity, obliteration, oblivion, scratch, shutout, trifle, void, wind, zero, zilch, zip, zippo, zot

I have nothing more to add

Christopha
28th September 2005, 08:54 PM
Om...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................om.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................om......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................etc.

Wongo
29th September 2005, 10:26 AM
Echnidna, you made something out of nothing. Well done. :cool:

bennylaird
29th September 2005, 10:46 AM
prefer a void...................

JackoH
29th September 2005, 12:53 PM
Vacuum.

Wongo
29th September 2005, 12:55 PM
cleaner

biotechy2k
29th September 2005, 01:20 PM
I see your nothing and raise you a nada but then again I just may be bluffing

bio

savage
29th September 2005, 01:52 PM
cleaner

sucks





savage(Eric).:)

bennylaird
29th September 2005, 02:22 PM
Such a senseless waste of human life..................

E. maculata
29th September 2005, 03:01 PM
And perfectly good oxygen

corbs
29th September 2005, 03:04 PM
_. / _ _ _ / _ / .... / .. / _ . / _ _. ;)

Daddles
29th September 2005, 03:46 PM
Watch it boys, we're drifting horribly close to posting something, not that this is a warning or anything, just the vacuous vapourings of a senile old fart

Richard

bennylaird
29th September 2005, 03:49 PM
I suggest if anything does get posted it should be heavily censored back to Nuthin......

echnidna
29th September 2005, 04:20 PM
prefer a void...................

HERE (http://nothingatall.no-ip.org/) is a perfect void (in html of course)

echnidna
9th October 2005, 01:45 PM
Looks like the thread died,
Pity as theres a lot of nothing about Anthony Robbins on another thread

rick_rine
9th October 2005, 08:31 PM
Even Anthony Robbins could build this if he wasnt so busy making money .

Bath is removed to make a change table . Yes for sure there are much better ones on this forum but I must admit there are much , much better woodworkers than me too .



Cost to build , NOTHING . Thats the post .

DavidG
9th October 2005, 08:33 PM
echnidna
Nothing doing tonight? :confused:

Robert WA
9th October 2005, 08:52 PM
I thought about posting something, but.....................................

E. maculata
9th October 2005, 10:52 PM
.........................Whataya do bout it?

corbs
9th October 2005, 11:45 PM
http://images.google.com.au/images?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&q=nothing&btnG=Search&sa=N&tab=wi

Pete J
10th October 2005, 12:13 AM
Good evening all

Nothing is good enough for this thread even though this thread is good for nothing. Nothing deserves an answer except for the following question -

If I am building a triangle to support a seat, using timber that is 92 mm wide (when viewing the triangle in plan), so that the upright is 375 mm long and the right-angled top is 435 mm long, what's the untrimmed length of the hypotenuse, (to determine how long to cut the piece before trimming the ends to fit and take account of the angles at each end)?

Nothing could be simpler, but perhaps this is not simpler than nothing.

A strange conundrum I admit, but then again, this is Sunday evening.

Regards

Waldo
10th October 2005, 12:52 AM
G'day,

Nothing but to do and read this thread or go to bed. Think I'll go to bed and have a sleep and do nothing while I'm at it. :D

Skew ChiDAMN!!
10th October 2005, 02:37 AM
http://druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/oregonprohib/nothing.jpg

Ashore
10th October 2005, 11:14 AM
If I am building a triangle to support a seat, using timber that is 92 mm wide (when viewing the triangle in plan), so that the upright is 375 mm long and the right-angled top is 435 mm long, what's the untrimmed length of the hypotenuse, (to determine how long to cut the piece before trimming the ends to fit and take account of the angles at each end)?

Give us a sketch pete if this is wrong cause this is how i've interperated you so far.
Normally the hypotenuse is the square root of the sum of the squares of the oyher two sides ( in a right angel triangle)
or 375 squared = 140,625
435 squared = 189225
Total = 329850 the square root of this is 574.33 mm

Skew ChiDAMN!!
24th October 2005, 02:07 AM
Give us a sketch pete if this is wrong cause this is how i've interperated you so far.
Normally the hypotenuse is the square root of the sum of the squares of the oyher two sides ( in a right angel triangle)
or 375 squared = 140,625
435 squared = 189225
Total = 329850 the square root of this is 574.33 mm

Assuming your maths is correct (not gonna check it) you're right in assuming pythagorus' theorem applies. However, your figures give us the total length of the diagonal and don't allow for the 92mm thickness of the top & side pieces. So, unless we know how he's joining, it can't be calculated.

For example, let's assume he's just going to butt-join to the inside of these two pieces. We could go the technogeek route and calculate both required angles (TanX = OppX/AdjX, and TanY = AdjX/OppX) to use the resultant angles in calculating the hypotenuse for each triangluated end. (HypX = OppX1/SinX & HypY = OppY1/SinY, where OppX1, OppY1 = 92mm) We could then subtract these two lengths from the total external hypotenuse that you've previously calculated to give us the outside length of the brace.

We could go the engineering route and work it out more simply. (TanX = 375/435) Having one angle, we know the other angle is 90°-X° but we don't need to work even that out 'cos all we're after is the hypotenuse and simple geometry tells us that both triangulated ends will be the same, so we work out the hypotenuse for one end (HypX=92/SinX), double it and subtract that result from your length.

Or, as woodies, we could joint the top/side together, use a straight edge to scribe the diagonal and measure it with a tape. :D

Simplest of all is the yuppy method. Ring up a woodie, give him the specs and say "do it."

Do you want to hear the programmer's route? "Not our problem, that's hardware."

How about the housewifes? :confused: No? Spoilsports! :D

Gingermick
24th October 2005, 07:55 AM
Why is Pythagorus' theorem still called a theorem and not Pythagorus' law?

Skew ChiDAMN!!
26th October 2005, 05:39 PM
He failed law school?

echnidna
16th April 2006, 04:04 PM
:)

ss_11000
16th April 2006, 06:21 PM
and to this relatively new member.........i've been inspried about nothing

Bob Willson
16th April 2006, 06:30 PM
> 0

Skew ChiDAMN!!
16th April 2006, 09:06 PM
and to this relatively new member.........i've been inspried about nothing

You're well on your way to becoming an expert then.

After all, an expert specialises more'n'more in a smaller'n'smaller field of study until he knows absolutely everything about nothing.

:D

Auld Bassoon
16th April 2006, 09:15 PM
You're well on your way to becoming an expert then.

After all, an expert specialises more'n'more in a smaller'n'smaller field of study until he knows absolutely everything about nothing.

:D

There are a few (actually hundreds!) of consultants from one of the big four (near, well actually at the top of, the alphabetic list) where I work that fit this category very well indeed...

The sad thing is that they will keep insiting that they are right, when all available evidence pouts to the contrary. Ah well :rolleyes:

Skew ChiDAMN!!
16th April 2006, 09:32 PM
:D

That reminds me of a conversation I overheard in the uni caf while doing my degree...

#1: The answer is definitely Yes.
#2: Wrong. Facts show it is No.
#1: Then the question was posed incorrectly.

I've no idea what subject they were talking about, not sure I want to know. But I'll bet they were working on a master's degree. ;)

AlexS
16th April 2006, 10:10 PM
:D

That reminds me of a conversation I overheard in the uni caf while doing my degree...

#1: The answer is definitely Yes.
#2: Wrong. Facts show it is No.
#1: Then the question was posed incorrectly.

I've no idea what subject they were talking about, not sure I want to know. But I'll bet they were working on a master's degree. ;)

Nah...that degree of sophistry would have to lead to a PhD.

(Sorry Iain and all the other PhDs here:D )

Iain
17th April 2006, 08:53 AM
(Sorry Iain and all the other PhDs here:D )
Why? if it was socialology that sounds like the norm, even an Assc Diploma:D :D :D
I recall my 2 units (and hated them) that we told there are no wrong answers, even though I nearly failed:rolleyes: I suppose I just answered my own question there though with 'nearly'.
BUt then I put forward a male perspective to a female question which did not go down well:p

echnidna
26th August 2007, 07:46 PM
BUMP


More About Nothing (http://nothingatall.no-ip.org/)

corbs
26th August 2007, 08:14 PM
Nothing much on this thread for a while :rolleyes:

pawnhead
26th August 2007, 08:58 PM
Anything is possible.



Even the infinite!



Something (http://www.zombo.com/)

rgum
26th August 2007, 09:02 PM
YaY! . Richmond just beat Essendon. Is that nothing ? :rolleyes: :hpydans2: