artme
23rd August 2013, 03:01 PM
I think we all enjoyed Mutawintji's little who am I posts.
I particularly liked the one on Cognitive dissonance.
Here is a scenario that is very real for me at the moment:
A fellow asks for a loan of $10 000 to finish house renovations so he can sell the property to settle some debts.
The person approached says no, but I will help you out bit by bit as you your tasks arise I will will go with
you as you purchase products and pay for them with my credit card
Just pay me back when all is finished. He begs for his wife not to be told. This is agreed to.
Work is virtually finished finished and the borrower approaches the lender and asks if he would like to buy the house.
Lender agrees, price settled, contract signed with now conditional clauses. Lender is obviously soft hearted and soft headed.:bricks:
Borrower begs off paying the debt.
When the matter goes to court the borrower answers the lender's demands for payment with a statement containing
many falsehoods and exaggerations. He, the borrower is adamant that he has done landscaping work on the property
concerned which, surprise surprise , almost equates exactly t to the amount lent to him.
The borrower is so adamant that the lender's proof is lies proof is "lies" that he sticks to his story and adds to it.
My reading of this is that the borrower is displaying cognitive dissonance.
His wife finally found out about the debt when the bailiff arrived, the excrement hit the rapidly rotating blades of the ventilation device
and the borrower has concocted a story to cover his tracks.
What say all ye thoughtful ones about this??
I particularly liked the one on Cognitive dissonance.
Here is a scenario that is very real for me at the moment:
A fellow asks for a loan of $10 000 to finish house renovations so he can sell the property to settle some debts.
The person approached says no, but I will help you out bit by bit as you your tasks arise I will will go with
you as you purchase products and pay for them with my credit card
Just pay me back when all is finished. He begs for his wife not to be told. This is agreed to.
Work is virtually finished finished and the borrower approaches the lender and asks if he would like to buy the house.
Lender agrees, price settled, contract signed with now conditional clauses. Lender is obviously soft hearted and soft headed.:bricks:
Borrower begs off paying the debt.
When the matter goes to court the borrower answers the lender's demands for payment with a statement containing
many falsehoods and exaggerations. He, the borrower is adamant that he has done landscaping work on the property
concerned which, surprise surprise , almost equates exactly t to the amount lent to him.
The borrower is so adamant that the lender's proof is lies proof is "lies" that he sticks to his story and adds to it.
My reading of this is that the borrower is displaying cognitive dissonance.
His wife finally found out about the debt when the bailiff arrived, the excrement hit the rapidly rotating blades of the ventilation device
and the borrower has concocted a story to cover his tracks.
What say all ye thoughtful ones about this??