PDA

View Full Version : Nanny / Police state?















Sebastiaan56
14th January 2010, 07:58 AM
From the news this morning,

Police want an alcohol ban on Australia Day | Herald Sun (http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/national/police-want-grog-ban-on-australia-day/story-e6frf7l6-1225819017791)

Now the apparatchik of the state is trying to control what I can and cannot drink on Australia Day. I appreciate the point on violence but the fraction of a percent of the people who who enjoy a drink on Australia Day is not an excuse to try to remove my right to stick what I like in my mouth. :((

Where does it stop?

Big Shed
14th January 2010, 08:54 AM
Next they will email car dealers to ask them to stop selling cars so we can reduce the road toll:rolleyes:

Waldo
14th January 2010, 11:20 AM
It's akin to a commercial I saw after watching a late night movie on SBS. The vision showed smoking chimney stacks, a dying planet and finished with cows. The TVC was for vegans and their message was to save the planet from carbon emissions we should all stop eating cows and become vegans. :screwy:

The common sense of some group or organisations at times leaves me scratching my head. :?

petersemple
14th January 2010, 12:15 PM
... to save the planet from carbon emissions we should all stop eating cows and become vegans. :screwy:



If God didn't want us to eat cows, He wouldn't have made them out of meat.

jimbur
14th January 2010, 01:22 PM
I agree it's over the top but the headline is misleading too - the police didn't call for a ban on alcohol.
I can understand the police attitude even if I don't agree with their request. The question "where will it all end" can be answered by, "for the police it doesn't".
If they are lucky they just end up stopping a fight and giving evidence in court. However, attending road accidents, coping with the carnage, informing the parents not to lay a place at the table is part of their job.
Then it starts all over again.
I don't think I'd be thinking too straight after constantly dealing with the results of alcohol abuse.
Jim

snowyskiesau
14th January 2010, 06:48 PM
Do the police honestly expect anyone who sells alcohol for a living to take any notice of such a request?

I'd certainly support a ban on alcohol consumption in a public place.

hughie
17th January 2010, 04:11 PM
I guess on the face of it , it seems to be a good idea. But then why would those want drink simply buy ahead of time and get drunk anyway.

Sorta reminds me of the logic behind the six o'clock swill from the 50s and 60s.

artme
23rd January 2010, 08:14 AM
Been In Chile for a few days now. Last Sunday was the second round of Presidential election voting. No alcohol can be sold here on election days. Don't know if it's good or bad policy or whether it changes behaviour, but the election was nice and peaceful.

damian
28th January 2010, 11:15 AM
The problem is we don't punish offenders. This like many legal issues is about punishing the majority to look like they are doing something, while the core group of repeat offenders get away with a pat on the wrist. It's not just drunken violence, it's drink driving, speeding and a host of other antisocial activities.

If you have a look at the data, where it's available, if we took a very few people out of society via jail or whatever the incidence of crashes, riots etc would fall signifigantly. Trouble is they won't do it because of bleeding heart socialists who are more interested in the rights of the purpetrator than the suffering of the victim.

:D Opinionated as always...

Metal Head
28th January 2010, 01:07 PM
The problem is we don't punish offenders. This like many legal issues is about punishing the majority to look like they are doing something, while the core group of repeat offenders get away with a pat on the wrist. It's not just drunken violence, it's drink driving, speeding and a host of other antisocial activities.

If you have a look at the data, where it's available, if we took a very few people out of society via jail or whatever the incidence of crashes, riots etc would fall signifigantly. Trouble is they won't do it because of bleeding heart socialists who are more interested in the rights of the purpetrator than the suffering of the victim.

:D Opinionated as always...

Damian are you willing to come down here to Melbourne and run as an independant at the next election later on this year - I would certainly vote for you:wink:

Yesterday whilst driving, a blind man (with his wife) got on our near full tram. By the time we reached the next stop this kid (aged around 14) hadn't given up the seat that is there for disabled/elderly folk when required. I asked him to get up and allow the blind gentleman to sit down but whilst getting up begrudgingly he complained he was being victimised:o. I then got on the microphone and told him (and anyone else listening) that in my day you didn't need to be asked you did it out of politeness and good manners. Not many youngsters (well who use public transport) seem to respect (or care) about disabled or elderly people these days, or I am alone in thinking this?

Cheers
MH

damian
28th January 2010, 01:49 PM
Your in victoria so you know what bogan means. Such people have always been present in our society, I grew up in the western suburbs of sydney, where they are called "westies". I noticed, oh maybe 20 years ago, that we seemed to go from tolerating rude, loud, aggressive and thick people to celebrating them. Note I grew up surrounded by people who were unsophisticated, poorly educated, just plain dumb etc. I don't think less of them for any of that, and I don't expect everyone to pull themselves out of the gutter like I did, but praising people for bad behaviour I think is a step too far.

It has been suggested that we are suffering from a couple of sucessive generations of spoiled kids, and we've now reached a point where they expect everything for nothing and never to suffer any consequences. I don't know. I recall "adults" hammering us when we were young, I also recall that the predictions of my cousin and I ending up in jail didn't come true, nor that the school prefects would do well in life. Last I looked he and I are comfy middle class and most of the "good kids" ended up alcoholics and divorced.

Proper research has shown there are a percentage of people in society predisposed to lying and thieving, and a percentage predisposed to irresponsible behaviour like drink driving and alcohol fueled violence. I haven't seen proper data for the street violence thing but I have seen some for car crashes. The fact is speeding tickets and booze buses don't work for lots of reasons, but one biggy is this core group of repeat offenders. I don't suggest everyone found speeding or DUI should be clapped in irons, there are a specific group of serial serious offenders, many with at least one fatality under their belts, some with quite a few killings and maimings. Doesn't matter what you do to them they just keep on re-offending. Nothing short of ongoing jail will protect us from them.

Incidentally:

Road safety statistics (http://www.transport.qld.gov.au/Home/Safety/Road/Statistics/)

This is qld. Take a look at the death's per year graph in the annual reports. This one even shocked me. Steady decline until 1998, the year speed cameras were introduced to qld, that year a rise and plateau. The governments own numbers show speeding tickets don't reduce speed related crashes, what they do very well is increase crashes where inattention is a signifigant factor.

I need to get a life don't I ? :D

Metal Head
28th January 2010, 02:19 PM
I don't suggest everyone found speeding or DUI should be clapped in irons, there are a specific group of serial serious offenders, many with at least one fatality under their belts, some with quite a few killings and maimings. Doesn't matter what you do to them they just keep on re-offending. Nothing short of ongoing jail will protect us from them.

Hi Damian,

Nothing wrong with your attitude towards 'bogans' I just wish there were more people out there with enough guts to write what they really feel instead of doing nothing and going along complaining but having no bottle to do anything about it. As I have mentioned previously I lost a cousin back in the old country because of a drink driver. It devastated her mother who died within a year from a broken heart. As you say these people (even if they are not repeat offenders) have shorten one persons life not to say of the trauma to the rest of the family. If they are to be allowed out into society then they can if they have their hands and lower part of their arms chopped off so that should solve any re-offending. If you want to act irresponsibly then you have to pay the consequences - no second chances... there are plenty of alternatives.

Most of the prefects in my final year at school (including me) have gone on to have successful careers without anyone going off the rails. Generally speaking it is people with a low IQ who are the mainstream criminals in this World - unless power (or greed) has gone to their head.

Oh well got to go out and face the general public again. I wonder which moron(s) will cross my path tonight:).

Cheers
MH

TermiMonster
28th January 2010, 05:02 PM
.......Generally speaking it is people with a low IQ who are the mainstream criminals in this World .......
MH
Gotta call you on that one....they are the petty criminals, but the smart ones are just better at avoiding prosecution.
TM

jimbur
28th January 2010, 05:15 PM
Gotta call you on that one....they are the petty criminals, but the smart ones are just better at avoiding prosecution.
TM

Smart enough to employ lawyers and accountants who can find the loopholes for them anyway. Who is the crim then?
Cheers,
Jim

Sebastiaan56
29th January 2010, 07:35 AM
Generally speaking it is people with a low IQ who are the mainstream criminals in this World - unless power (or greed) has gone to their head.

Seems like the jury is out on that one Metal, here are some abstracts from a couple of papers on the subject

NCJRS Abstract - National Criminal Justice Reference Service (http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/Abstract.aspx?id=183065)

Intelligence and Crime - Measuring The Size Of The Iq-crime Correlation (http://law.jrank.org/pages/1363/Intelligence-Crime-Measuring-size-IQ-crime-correlation.html)

Intelligence and Crime - Explaining The Iq-crime Correlation (http://law.jrank.org/pages/1365/Intelligence-Crime-Explaining-IQ-crime-correlation.html)

Sociological factors and family history are strong correlations. But IQ can be quite easily manipulated. There was a great show last year on SBS where a bloke trained to do the Mensa test and lifted his IQ 20 odd points in a few weeks. I think its a relatively meaningless measure, it measures your ability to do an IQ test.

I notice there was the usual bogan violence again this year, Maybe we should cancel Australia Day altogether?

damian
29th January 2010, 10:12 AM
IQ tests were developed to measure ones ability to do specific thought functions. They were used to recruit code breakers in WW1. Unfortunately because the system has the word intelligence in it people came to believe it was more than it is.

IQ is fine for what it's intended for, like hammers are good for driving nails, less sucessful at applying paint.

Bob38S
29th January 2010, 12:19 PM
Announced yesterday

- "they" want pool cues and glass ashtrays removed from pubs in Queensland.

So, What is next???

Waldo
29th January 2010, 01:26 PM
Announced yesterday

- "they" want pool cues and glass ashtrays removed from pubs in Queensland.

So, What is next???

You'll be playing pool with the little straw that you just drank your bundy and coke out of. :D

Sebastiaan56
29th January 2010, 03:11 PM
Bundy light, 2.75% alcohol

Bob38S
30th January 2010, 10:16 AM
You'll be playing pool with the little straw that you just drank your bundy and coke out of. :D

There are pubs in Brisbane where you can only buy a Bundy out of a tap as nips/cans [according to what was said is policy - from the hotel I gather] after a certain hour are banned.


Best method for Bundy - after years of dedicated ongoing research and expense -

Crack a can of Pepsi not Coke

Drink/spill a good mouthful of the contents

Top up with the Square Bear until it runs around and fills the rim

Call out loudly "ooops" and slurp the "overfill"

Exhale a satisfied "Aaah and smile broadly at all around at solving the problem.

When finished that can try another to see whether the problem was a one off or is repeatable - true scientific method. :2tsup:

After a couple of these you have completed your research for the day but like a true dedicated researcher you know that you will need to continue your research tomorrow as the change in temperature, humidity, phase of the moon, wind direction are all variables which can affect the outcome :o

Don't you just love science :;

Sturdee
30th January 2010, 03:54 PM
Don't you just love science :;

I used to do those science experiments years ago except that it was Bacardi and Coke. :2tsup:


Peter.

damian
1st February 2010, 09:41 AM
They could just ban the rum instead of the glass and cues. I'm allergic to rum, and don't frequent pubs, but I'm told people get more agro drinking rum.

Perhaps whiskey hits you so fast your not coherant enough for fighting.. ? Dunno.

BTW Coopers Pilsener 62, quite inoffensive. Tried it this weekend. Expensive but quite nice as beers go.